From: Gustavo Barros <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Bastien <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Bug: org-refile-get-target offers default candidate in duplicity [9.2.6 (9.2.6-4-ge30905-elpaplus @ /home/gustavo/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20191007/)]
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 19:53:06 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw)
On Thu, Feb 13 2020, Bastien wrote:
>> I tested it and indeed the duplicate candidate is gone. However, the
>> last refile target no longer seems to be offered as the default for a
>> subsequent refile operation. Was that intentional?
> Nope, an oversight -- fixed in master.
Thank you very much.
I've tested it again, and I believe it is working as intended.
I observe, however, a difference of behavior between
"completing-read-default" and "ivy-completing-read" in the workings of
"org-refile-get-location". Namely, with "completing-read-default" the
chosen target is stored in "org-refile-history" with a trailing slash
(the "extra" part), while with "ivy-completing-read" it is stored
without the trailing slash.
I have no idea why this is so and also don't know if this stems from
Org's end. As far as I can tell, functionality of the feature with
respect to this bug report is working as intended: no duplicate
candidates, and history is honored. But the difference surprised me and
if you think it might be important, I can provide an ECM for it.
Otherwise, I think this can well closed as fixed.
Once again, thanks a lot for the fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-13 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-07 18:34 Bug: org-refile-get-target offers default candidate in duplicity [9.2.6 (9.2.6-4-ge30905-elpaplus @ /home/gustavo/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20191007/)] Gustavo Barros
2020-02-12 23:35 ` Bastien
2020-02-13 1:51 ` Gustavo Barros
2020-02-13 7:45 ` Bastien
2020-02-13 19:44 ` Samuel Wales
2020-02-14 10:02 ` Bastien
2020-02-17 0:06 ` Samuel Wales
2020-02-17 0:14 ` Bastien
2020-02-17 0:17 ` Samuel Wales
2020-02-17 0:25 ` Samuel Wales
2020-02-17 0:38 ` Bastien
2020-02-17 1:58 ` Samuel Wales
2020-02-17 22:55 ` Bastien
2020-02-17 0:15 ` Samuel Wales
2020-02-13 22:53 ` Gustavo Barros [this message]
2020-02-13 23:13 ` Samuel Wales
2020-02-14 10:02 ` Bastien
2020-02-14 13:41 ` Gustavo Barros
2020-02-14 15:29 ` Bastien
2020-02-14 16:37 ` Gustavo Barros
2020-02-14 15:33 ` Gustavo Barros
2020-02-16 23:22 ` Bastien
2020-02-17 0:45 ` Gustavo Barros
2020-02-17 17:45 ` Bastien
2020-02-13 2:06 ` Gustavo Barros
2020-02-13 7:19 ` Bastien
2020-02-13 20:51 ` Gustavo Barros
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).