From: "Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: org-meta-return
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:10:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <868v6bib56.fsf@somewhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87vc9fjvlb.fsf@ucl.ac.uk
Eric,
Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> I hope everybody does that. I use both the left and right control keys
>> depending on where the "controlled" key is: C-whatever is always a two-hand
>> operation for me. M-x is not however (they are close enough so that left
>> thumb and index can do the job): both right and left Alt keys are mapped to
>> meta so there is no reason it couldn't be other than habit. But I probably
>> should get out of the habit.
>
> As a previous sufferer of serious RSI, I always warn people against
> key-chording that requires any contortion. C-M-x (with x=anything on the
> left half of the keyboard basically) is a bad thing. In fact, often anything
> with M- is bad for me. I tend to avoid such key chords. For instance, for
> M-x, I have
>
> (global-set-key '[(control x) (control m)] 'execute-extended-command)
>
> Actually, in practice, I use evil-mode everywhere so I have practically no
> key chords! For M-x, I type ", x"... I have defined a number of key org
> commands into the evil key maps and I'm a happy camper!
Quite a bit OT, but is it true that, for example, to type `C-whatever', we
should use both hands, one for `C' and the other for `whatever'?
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-26 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-20 19:32 org-meta-return 42 147
2013-02-20 19:40 ` org-meta-return Suvayu Ali
2013-02-20 21:17 ` org-meta-return 42 147
2013-02-20 21:57 ` org-meta-return Jonathan Leech-Pepin
2013-02-20 22:33 ` org-meta-return Suvayu Ali
2013-02-20 22:59 ` org-meta-return Nick Dokos
2013-02-20 23:25 ` org-meta-return W. Greenhouse
2013-02-20 23:28 ` org-meta-return 42 147
2013-02-21 0:11 ` org-meta-return Nick Dokos
2013-02-21 0:43 ` org-meta-return Suvayu Ali
2013-02-21 1:10 ` org-meta-return Nick Dokos
2013-02-26 9:03 ` org-meta-return Eric S Fraga
2013-02-26 11:10 ` Sebastien Vauban [this message]
2013-02-26 13:16 ` org-meta-return Suvayu Ali
2013-02-26 15:54 ` org-meta-return Eric S Fraga
2013-02-21 21:16 ` org-meta-return 42 147
2013-02-23 3:30 ` org-meta-return James Harkins
2013-03-02 20:43 ` org-meta-return Michael Brand
2013-03-02 23:59 ` org-meta-return 42 147
2013-03-03 10:08 ` org-meta-return Michael Brand
2013-03-03 10:44 ` org-meta-return Eric Abrahamsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-31 0:16 org-meta-return 42 147
2016-10-31 11:10 ` org-meta-return Nicolas Goaziou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=868v6bib56.fsf@somewhere.org \
--to=wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7uqw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).