emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Greg Tucker-Kellogg <gtuckerkellogg@gmail.com>
To: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>,
	Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dev] About a beamer back-end
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:23:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <662913B2-BB47-4A3A-AACD-D7FC6F59927B@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k3z32eug.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2798 bytes --]

I also quite like using headlines for blocks, for many of the same reasons Eric mentioned.  In addition, I regularly use column view to set BEAMER_env, BEAMER_envargs, BEAMER_extra, etc., and column view operates on headlines.

Greg



On Jun 20, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:

> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>> 
>>> Well, I will have to chime in with a contrary view.  I like using
>>> headlines to define blocks, and I use blocks on almost every frame.  I
>>> have the following reasons for preferring a headline approach:
>>> 
>>> - the proposed approach does not easily (at all?) cater for blocks
>>>  within blocks
>> 
>> I may be missing your point, but you can have nested blocks.  What would
>> be more difficult to achieve with blocks?
> 
> Sorry!  I missed the begin...end structure for the blocks you were
> proposing.  Indeed, I see no reason that your proposal does not support
> a recursive nesting of blocks.
> 
>>> - ease of hiding of content: org for me is still primarily an
>>>  outliner!
>> 
>> You can hide blocks too.
> 
> but the difference is that the hidden block doesn't tell you anything
> about the block itself?  that is, there is no equivalent to the text
> content of a headline that is visible when the contents below the
> headline are hidden.  This is possibly (?) a minor point, mind you.
> 
>>> - being able to re-arrange content in a frame quickly (M-<up>, etc.)
>> 
>> See `org-element-drag-backward' and `org-element-drag-forward'.
> 
> Okay.  Will it be easy to bind these to M-<up> etc. to achieve
> consistent behaviour?  I.e. does org-metaup know what to do with blocks?
> 
>>> - within frames, there is no other use for lower level headlines.  Using
>>>  these for blocks seems appropriate.  What else could they be used
>>>  for?
>> 
>> Good question.
>> 
>> One idea would be to use them as outline tools that would have no impact
>> on export (they would help hiding frame contents in the buffer but would
>> be ignored in produced LaTeX code).
>> 
>> 
>> Obviously, both approaches (blocks or headlines) have drawbacks.  I'm
>> still unsure about which one would be the quickest/cleanest/most useful.
> 
> Understood!  And I don't want to stand in the way of an implementation
> of beamer support in the new exporter.
> 
> As a point for discussion and evaluation, attached is an example slide
> (both org and pdf) demonstrating the type of thing I tend to do for some
> of my beamer documents.
> 
> Also, please don't forget about columns!
> 
> <beamerblocks.org><beamerblocks.pdf>
> -- 
> : Eric S Fraga, GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D
> : in Emacs 24.1.50.1 and Org release_7.8.11-69-ga2fd96


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-20  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-15 15:08 [dev] About a beamer back-end Nicolas Goaziou
2012-06-15 16:41 ` suvayu ali
2012-06-15 16:47   ` Avdi Grimm
2012-06-18  7:50     ` Eric S Fraga
2012-06-18 12:35       ` suvayu ali
2012-06-19 13:21       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2012-06-19 21:04         ` Eric S Fraga
2012-06-20  6:23           ` Greg Tucker-Kellogg [this message]
2012-06-20 11:55             ` Sebastien Vauban
2012-06-20 15:20               ` Eric S Fraga
2012-06-21 14:37           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2012-06-21 14:51             ` Sebastien Vauban
2012-06-21 16:03               ` Nicolas Goaziou
     [not found]                 ` <87obocodo7.fsf-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-21 21:14                   ` **: " Sebastien Vauban
2012-06-25 22:39                     ` Andreas Leha
2012-06-21 14:55             ` Rasmus
2012-06-21 15:56               ` Nicolas Goaziou
2012-06-21 16:36                 ` Rasmus
2012-06-21 16:49             ` suvayu ali
2012-06-22  7:54             ` Eric S Fraga
2012-06-18  6:32 ` Daniel Bausch
2012-06-18 10:17 ` Rasmus
2012-06-18 10:35   ` Sebastien Vauban
2012-06-18 12:00     ` Rasmus
2012-06-28 10:40 ` Andreas Leha
2012-06-28 10:47   ` suvayu ali
2012-06-28 10:50     ` Andreas Leha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=662913B2-BB47-4A3A-AACD-D7FC6F59927B@gmail.com \
    --to=gtuckerkellogg@gmail.com \
    --cc=e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=n.goaziou@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).