emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Toggle between active and inactive timestamp in CLOCK line does not make sense
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:25:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2012-06-26T12-47-32@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: jsbvmu$fg8$1@dough.gmane.org

* Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@online.de> wrote:
> Hi,

Hallo Reiner!

> having a CLOCK line: (example)
>        [2012-06-26 Di 11:00]   CLOCK: [2012-06-26 Di 11:00]--[2012-06-26 Di 12:00] =>  1:00
>
> many times I do adjust the timestamps.
> Unintentionally having point on "]" and or "[" instead of the minute part of the timestamp
> and shifting up or down in order to increase or decrease the timestamp the keypress switches the "]" to ">"
> and the "[" to "<".
>
> I would suggest to stop this behaviour, as it does not make sense in a CLOCK line.

I suggest to keep this behavior because:

- it is consistent: being on brackets change the type.
  Everywhere, not just outside of CLOCK lines.

- Org-mode changes the timestamp according to the position of the
  cursor: on year it changes the year, on month it changes the
  month, on day it changes the day, on hour it changes the hour, on
  minute it changes the minutes (in 5 minutes steps). On the
  bracket, it changes the type.

I really do not intend to offend you but you should simply position
your cursor more carefully since changing timestamps simply is
related to that position as described above.

Or maybe there is a variable which could deactivate timestamp type
change behavior in general.

You might be right with «Toggle between active and inactive
timestamp in CLOCK line does not make sense» but I do think that
«the toggle mechanism to change timestamp type behaves consistently
everywhere» is more important here.

-- 
Karl Voit

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-26 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-26  9:34 Toggle between active and inactive timestamp in CLOCK line does not make sense Rainer Stengele
2012-06-26 11:25 ` Karl Voit [this message]
2012-06-26 14:06   ` Gregor Zattler
2012-06-26 15:26     ` Karl Voit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2012-06-26T12-47-32@devnull.Karl-Voit.at \
    --to=devnull@karl-voit.at \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=news1142@Karl-Voit.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).