* latex <-> org ? @ 2008-12-04 16:51 Dan Davison 2008-12-04 23:12 ` Dan Davison 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Dan Davison @ 2008-12-04 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs org-mode mailing list Has anyone worked on reversible transformation between org and latex? I'm collaborating on a latex document with some non-org users. Basically what I'd like to do is transform a latex document into an org document, fold/unfold sections and edit the document under org-mode, and then reconvert to latex. The end result would be as if the transformation to org had never happened. At its simplest those functions would convert between '\section' <-> '* section', '\subsection' <-> '** subsection' etc, but obviously there's a lot more that could be done such as all the conversions that org-export-to-latex does; I imagine that function couldn't be used directly, but ideally the inverse of the latex->org function would share conversion code with org-export-to-latex. Does this idea make sense, and has anyone already worked on this? Dan -- http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: latex <-> org ? 2008-12-04 16:51 latex <-> org ? Dan Davison @ 2008-12-04 23:12 ` Dan Davison 2008-12-08 12:39 ` Harri Kiiskinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Dan Davison @ 2008-12-04 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs org-mode mailing list For what it's worth, here's my attempt at a simple version of this. These flip a latex document into org mode so that you can see the document structure, and then flip it back, hopefully to the same latex document. #+begin_src ... #+end_src are inserted in the org version so that text in unfolded sections can be edited in latex-mode via C-c '. The only latex tags operated on are \section, \subsection and \subsubsection. But maybe a proper version of this already exists somewhere? Dan (defun org-latex-to-org () "Convert latex buffer to org." (interactive) (beginning-of-buffer) (if (save-excursion (re-search-forward "^\\\\title{\\([^}]*\\)}" nil t)) (insert (concat "#+title: " (match-string 1) "\n")) (insert "#+title: [No title found]\n")) (insert "* Preamble\n") (let (level dummy) (dotimes (level 3) (let (string) (dotimes (dummy level) (setq string (concat "sub" string))) ;; how do you make e.g. 'subsub'? (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward (concat "^\\\\" string "section\\(\\*?{.*\\)$") nil t) (replace-match (concat (make-string (1+ level) (string-to-char "*")) " " (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) ;; further '\'s might occur e.g. \label{} nil nil) (beginning-of-line) (insert "#+end_src\n") (end-of-line) (insert "\n#+begin_src latex")))))) (org-mode)) (defun org-latex-to-org-inverse () "Convert org buffer to latex. Intended to be the inverse of org-latex-to-org." (interactive) (latex-mode) (beginning-of-buffer) (kill-line 2) (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "^#\\+begin_src latex" nil t) (kill-line 0) (kill-line))) (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "^#\\+end_src" nil t) (kill-line 0) (kill-line))) (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "^\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) (replace-match (concat "\\\\section" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) nil nil))) (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "^\\*\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) (replace-match (concat "\\\\subsection" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) nil nil))) (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "^\\*\\*\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) (replace-match (concat "\\\\subsubsection" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) nil nil)))) On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:51:44AM -0500, Dan Davison wrote: > Has anyone worked on reversible transformation between org and latex? > I'm collaborating on a latex document with some non-org > users. Basically what I'd like to do is transform a latex document > into an org document, fold/unfold sections and edit the document under > org-mode, and then reconvert to latex. The end result would be as if > the transformation to org had never happened. > > At its simplest those functions would convert between '\section' <-> > '* section', '\subsection' <-> '** subsection' etc, but obviously > there's a lot more that could be done such as all the conversions that > org-export-to-latex does; I imagine that function couldn't be used > directly, but ideally the inverse of the latex->org function would > share conversion code with org-export-to-latex. Does this idea make > sense, and has anyone already worked on this? > > Dan > > -- > http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode -- http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: latex <-> org ? 2008-12-04 23:12 ` Dan Davison @ 2008-12-08 12:39 ` Harri Kiiskinen 2008-12-18 16:50 ` orgstruct minor mode (WAS: latex <-> org ?) Dan Davison 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Harri Kiiskinen @ 2008-12-08 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: davison; +Cc: emacs-orgmode Very nice! I've been hoping for this kind of functionality for a while, since I'm really struggling to organize some text-mass produced by myself over the years, and it seems, that with this I can re-organize largish LaTeX-documents with relative ease. (For some reason, the order in which a text is naturally written may not be the one that is most interesting to read...) A quick test drive gives ok, the document is exactly the same (tested with diff) after having gone through the conversion back and forth. I think it is a good thing to keep this separate from any of the org-mode export functions. As far as I can see, the main use for this is the editing of already existing LaTeX file (as in the case of the original request), where you have to keep the file as closely resembling the original as possible. Also, this does not seem like something you use all the time when editing LaTeX-files, but more like a tool very handy for reorganizing and restructuring your work, i.e. not a replacement for org-export-latex, but a tool to integrate existing material to the new, exciting org-mode work flow. Harri K. From: Dan Davison <davison@stats.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [Orgmode] latex <-> org ? Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:12:31 -0500 > For what it's worth, here's my attempt at a simple version of > this. These flip a latex document into org mode so that you can see > the document structure, and then flip it back, hopefully to the same > latex document. #+begin_src ... #+end_src are inserted in the org > version so that text in unfolded sections can be edited in latex-mode > via C-c '. The only latex tags operated on are \section, \subsection > and \subsubsection. But maybe a proper version of this already exists > somewhere? > > Dan > > (defun org-latex-to-org () > "Convert latex buffer to org." > (interactive) > (beginning-of-buffer) > (if (save-excursion (re-search-forward "^\\\\title{\\([^}]*\\)}" nil t)) > (insert (concat "#+title: " (match-string 1) "\n")) > (insert "#+title: [No title found]\n")) > (insert "* Preamble\n") > (let (level dummy) > (dotimes (level 3) > (let (string) > (dotimes (dummy level) (setq string (concat "sub" string))) ;; how do you make e.g. 'subsub'? > (save-excursion > (while (re-search-forward (concat "^\\\\" string "section\\(\\*?{.*\\)$") nil t) > (replace-match > (concat (make-string (1+ level) (string-to-char "*")) " " > (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) ;; further '\'s might occur e.g. \label{} > nil nil) > (beginning-of-line) > (insert "#+end_src\n") > (end-of-line) > (insert "\n#+begin_src latex")))))) > (org-mode)) > > (defun org-latex-to-org-inverse () > "Convert org buffer to latex. Intended to be the inverse of org-latex-to-org." > (interactive) > (latex-mode) > (beginning-of-buffer) > (kill-line 2) > (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "^#\\+begin_src latex" nil t) (kill-line 0) (kill-line))) > (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "^#\\+end_src" nil t) (kill-line 0) (kill-line))) > (save-excursion > (while (re-search-forward "^\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) > (replace-match > (concat "\\\\section" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) nil nil))) > (save-excursion > (while (re-search-forward "^\\*\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) > (replace-match > (concat "\\\\subsection" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) nil nil))) > (save-excursion > (while (re-search-forward "^\\*\\*\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) > (replace-match > (concat "\\\\subsubsection" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) nil nil)))) > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:51:44AM -0500, Dan Davison wrote: > > Has anyone worked on reversible transformation between org and latex? > > I'm collaborating on a latex document with some non-org > > users. Basically what I'd like to do is transform a latex document > > into an org document, fold/unfold sections and edit the document under > > org-mode, and then reconvert to latex. The end result would be as if > > the transformation to org had never happened. > > > > At its simplest those functions would convert between '\section' <-> > > '* section', '\subsection' <-> '** subsection' etc, but obviously > > there's a lot more that could be done such as all the conversions that > > org-export-to-latex does; I imagine that function couldn't be used > > directly, but ideally the inverse of the latex->org function would > > share conversion code with org-export-to-latex. Does this idea make > > sense, and has anyone already worked on this? > > > > Dan > > > > -- > > http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > -- > http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* orgstruct minor mode (WAS: latex <-> org ?) 2008-12-08 12:39 ` Harri Kiiskinen @ 2008-12-18 16:50 ` Dan Davison 2008-12-19 8:40 ` Carsten Dominik 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Dan Davison @ 2008-12-18 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode Hi all, I'm still working on a good strategy for using org-mode style visibility cycling when working on latex documents, and also for function bodies in code files. My current idea is that I should be using orgstruct minor mode to do this. I'm hoping that will allow me to have all the org-mode navigation/visibility cycling I want, while retaining all the native mode functionality, including font lock. So basically what I have in mind is the following psuedo-code org-convert-some-src-mode () insert-asterisks-at-appropriate-places enable-orgstruct-minor-mode org-overview and the reverse. The above works very nicely for hiding function bodies in files containing R function definitions, but I'm running into some problems with latex. Say I open this file (with a .tex extension) \begin{document} * h1 ** h11 * h2 ** h21 \end{document} It opens in latex-mode, and I enable orgstruct minor mode. I notice that the value of outline-regexp is currently a complicated regexp containing various latex section headings / macros. Now org-overview results in \begin{document} \end{document} In contrast, without the \begin \end macros, the file opens in TeX mode, outline-regexp is "[*\f]+" (what's the \f?), and org-overview results in * h1 * h2 as desired. However simply setting outline-regexp to "[*\f]+" doesn't seem to do the job -- then org-overview does nothing, with an "Unrecognized header" error. (I haven't found the source of that error message yet in org/emacs lisp code). I'd appreciate any comments on the approach I've outlined, and advice on how to get the asterisked latex buffer to respond to org-overview as desired. I know that there are existing applications of outline-mode to various major modes, but seeing as I am accustomed to org-mode, and seeing as Carsten worked on improving outline-mode at the outset of the org project, I am thinking that it's worth doing this in an org-specific way. Is that wrong? Should I just be using outline-mode for what I want to do? Thanks! Dan p.s. I note that org-overview is not listed as one of the functions that is available in orgstruct minor mode. Nevertheless it seems to often work, and I was hoping that (something like) it could indeed be _expected_ to work. On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:39:18PM +0200, Harri Kiiskinen wrote: > Very nice! I've been hoping for this kind of functionality for a > while, since I'm really struggling to organize some text-mass produced > by myself over the years, and it seems, that with this I can > re-organize largish LaTeX-documents with relative ease. (For some > reason, the order in which a text is naturally written may not be the > one that is most interesting to read...) A quick test drive gives ok, > the document is exactly the same (tested with diff) after having gone > through the conversion back and forth. > > I think it is a good thing to keep this separate from any of the > org-mode export functions. As far as I can see, the main use for this > is the editing of already existing LaTeX file (as in the case of the > original request), where you have to keep the file as closely > resembling the original as possible. > > Also, this does not seem like something you use all the time when > editing LaTeX-files, but more like a tool very handy for reorganizing > and restructuring your work, i.e. not a replacement for > org-export-latex, but a tool to integrate existing material to the > new, exciting org-mode work flow. > > Harri K. > > From: Dan Davison <davison@stats.ox.ac.uk> > Subject: Re: [Orgmode] latex <-> org ? > Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:12:31 -0500 > > > For what it's worth, here's my attempt at a simple version of > > this. These flip a latex document into org mode so that you can see > > the document structure, and then flip it back, hopefully to the same > > latex document. #+begin_src ... #+end_src are inserted in the org > > version so that text in unfolded sections can be edited in latex-mode > > via C-c '. The only latex tags operated on are \section, \subsection > > and \subsubsection. But maybe a proper version of this already exists > > somewhere? > > > > Dan > > > > (defun org-latex-to-org () > > "Convert latex buffer to org." > > (interactive) > > (beginning-of-buffer) > > (if (save-excursion (re-search-forward "^\\\\title{\\([^}]*\\)}" nil t)) > > (insert (concat "#+title: " (match-string 1) "\n")) > > (insert "#+title: [No title found]\n")) > > (insert "* Preamble\n") > > (let (level dummy) > > (dotimes (level 3) > > (let (string) > > (dotimes (dummy level) (setq string (concat "sub" string))) ;; how do you make e.g. 'subsub'? > > (save-excursion > > (while (re-search-forward (concat "^\\\\" string "section\\(\\*?{.*\\)$") nil t) > > (replace-match > > (concat (make-string (1+ level) (string-to-char "*")) " " > > (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) ;; further '\'s might occur e.g. \label{} > > nil nil) > > (beginning-of-line) > > (insert "#+end_src\n") > > (end-of-line) > > (insert "\n#+begin_src latex")))))) > > (org-mode)) > > > > (defun org-latex-to-org-inverse () > > "Convert org buffer to latex. Intended to be the inverse of org-latex-to-org." > > (interactive) > > (latex-mode) > > (beginning-of-buffer) > > (kill-line 2) > > (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "^#\\+begin_src latex" nil t) (kill-line 0) (kill-line))) > > (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "^#\\+end_src" nil t) (kill-line 0) (kill-line))) > > (save-excursion > > (while (re-search-forward "^\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) > > (replace-match > > (concat "\\\\section" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) nil nil))) > > (save-excursion > > (while (re-search-forward "^\\*\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) > > (replace-match > > (concat "\\\\subsection" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) nil nil))) > > (save-excursion > > (while (re-search-forward "^\\*\\*\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) > > (replace-match > > (concat "\\\\subsubsection" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) nil nil)))) > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:51:44AM -0500, Dan Davison wrote: > > > Has anyone worked on reversible transformation between org and latex? > > > I'm collaborating on a latex document with some non-org > > > users. Basically what I'd like to do is transform a latex document > > > into an org document, fold/unfold sections and edit the document under > > > org-mode, and then reconvert to latex. The end result would be as if > > > the transformation to org had never happened. > > > > > > At its simplest those functions would convert between '\section' <-> > > > '* section', '\subsection' <-> '** subsection' etc, but obviously > > > there's a lot more that could be done such as all the conversions that > > > org-export-to-latex does; I imagine that function couldn't be used > > > directly, but ideally the inverse of the latex->org function would > > > share conversion code with org-export-to-latex. Does this idea make > > > sense, and has anyone already worked on this? > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > > > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > > > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > > > -- > > http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison -- http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: orgstruct minor mode (WAS: latex <-> org ?) 2008-12-18 16:50 ` orgstruct minor mode (WAS: latex <-> org ?) Dan Davison @ 2008-12-19 8:40 ` Carsten Dominik 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Carsten Dominik @ 2008-12-19 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Davison; +Cc: emacs-orgmode [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8508 bytes --] Hi Dan, you best bet for this is using outline-minor-mode, in connection with org-cycle, see http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.php#use-visibility-cycling-in-outline-mode Trying to get orgstruct-mode working correctly for this means entering a world of pain. A world of pain, Larry. Of you want structure editing in LaTeX files, look at reftex-mode, use ">" and "<" in the reftex-toc buffer to demote and promote sections. - Carsten On Dec 18, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Dan Davison wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm still working on a good strategy for using org-mode style > visibility cycling when working on latex documents, and also for > function bodies in code files. My current idea is that I should be > using orgstruct minor mode to do this. I'm hoping that will allow me > to have all the org-mode navigation/visibility cycling I want, while > retaining all the native mode functionality, including font lock. So > basically what I have in mind is the following psuedo-code > > org-convert-some-src-mode () > insert-asterisks-at-appropriate-places > enable-orgstruct-minor-mode > org-overview > > and the reverse. > > The above works very nicely for hiding function bodies in files > containing R function definitions, but I'm running into some problems > with latex. Say I open this file (with a .tex extension) > > \begin{document} > * h1 > ** h11 > * h2 > ** h21 > \end{document} > > It opens in latex-mode, and I enable orgstruct minor mode. I notice > that the value of outline-regexp is currently a complicated regexp > containing various latex section headings / macros. Now org-overview > results in > > \begin{document} > \end{document} > > In contrast, without the \begin \end macros, the file opens in TeX > mode, outline-regexp is "[*\f]+" (what's the \f?), and org-overview > results in > > * h1 > * h2 > > as desired. > > However simply setting outline-regexp to "[*\f]+" doesn't seem to do > the job -- then org-overview does nothing, with an "Unrecognized > header" error. (I haven't found the source of that error message yet > in org/emacs lisp code). > > I'd appreciate any comments on the approach I've outlined, and advice > on how to get the asterisked latex buffer to respond to org-overview > as desired. > > I know that there are existing applications of outline-mode to various > major modes, but seeing as I am accustomed to org-mode, and seeing as > Carsten worked on improving outline-mode at the outset of the org > project, I am thinking that it's worth doing this in an org-specific > way. Is that wrong? Should I just be using outline-mode for what I > want to do? > > Thanks! > > Dan > > p.s. I note that org-overview is not listed as one of the functions > that is available in orgstruct minor mode. Nevertheless it seems to > often work, and I was hoping that (something like) it could indeed be > _expected_ to work. > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:39:18PM +0200, Harri Kiiskinen wrote: >> Very nice! I've been hoping for this kind of functionality for a >> while, since I'm really struggling to organize some text-mass >> produced >> by myself over the years, and it seems, that with this I can >> re-organize largish LaTeX-documents with relative ease. (For some >> reason, the order in which a text is naturally written may not be the >> one that is most interesting to read...) A quick test drive gives >> ok, >> the document is exactly the same (tested with diff) after having gone >> through the conversion back and forth. >> >> I think it is a good thing to keep this separate from any of the >> org-mode export functions. As far as I can see, the main use for this >> is the editing of already existing LaTeX file (as in the case of the >> original request), where you have to keep the file as closely >> resembling the original as possible. >> >> Also, this does not seem like something you use all the time when >> editing LaTeX-files, but more like a tool very handy for reorganizing >> and restructuring your work, i.e. not a replacement for >> org-export-latex, but a tool to integrate existing material to the >> new, exciting org-mode work flow. >> >> Harri K. >> >> From: Dan Davison <davison@stats.ox.ac.uk> >> Subject: Re: [Orgmode] latex <-> org ? >> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:12:31 -0500 >> >>> For what it's worth, here's my attempt at a simple version of >>> this. These flip a latex document into org mode so that you can see >>> the document structure, and then flip it back, hopefully to the same >>> latex document. #+begin_src ... #+end_src are inserted in the org >>> version so that text in unfolded sections can be edited in latex- >>> mode >>> via C-c '. The only latex tags operated on are \section, \subsection >>> and \subsubsection. But maybe a proper version of this already >>> exists >>> somewhere? >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> (defun org-latex-to-org () >>> "Convert latex buffer to org." >>> (interactive) >>> (beginning-of-buffer) >>> (if (save-excursion (re-search-forward "^\\\\title{\\([^}]*\\)}" >>> nil t)) >>> (insert (concat "#+title: " (match-string 1) "\n")) >>> (insert "#+title: [No title found]\n")) >>> (insert "* Preamble\n") >>> (let (level dummy) >>> (dotimes (level 3) >>> (let (string) >>> (dotimes (dummy level) (setq string (concat "sub" string))) ;; >>> how do you make e.g. 'subsub'? >>> (save-excursion >>> (while (re-search-forward (concat "^\\\\" string "section\\(\\*? >>> {.*\\)$") nil t) >>> (replace-match >>> (concat (make-string (1+ level) (string-to-char "*")) " " >>> (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\\\" (match-string >>> 1))) ;; further '\'s might occur e.g. \label{} >>> nil nil) >>> (beginning-of-line) >>> (insert "#+end_src\n") >>> (end-of-line) >>> (insert "\n#+begin_src latex")))))) >>> (org-mode)) >>> >>> (defun org-latex-to-org-inverse () >>> "Convert org buffer to latex. Intended to be the inverse of org- >>> latex-to-org." >>> (interactive) >>> (latex-mode) >>> (beginning-of-buffer) >>> (kill-line 2) >>> (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "^#\\+begin_src latex" >>> nil t) (kill-line 0) (kill-line))) >>> (save-excursion (while (re-search-forward "^#\\+end_src" nil t) >>> (kill-line 0) (kill-line))) >>> (save-excursion >>> (while (re-search-forward "^\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) >>> (replace-match >>> (concat "\\\\section" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\\\\ >>> \\" (match-string 1))) nil nil))) >>> (save-excursion >>> (while (re-search-forward "^\\*\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) >>> (replace-match >>> (concat "\\\\subsection" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" "\\\ >>> \\\\\" (match-string 1))) nil nil))) >>> (save-excursion >>> (while (re-search-forward "^\\*\\*\\* \\(.*\\)$" nil t) >>> (replace-match >>> (concat "\\\\subsubsection" (replace-regexp-in-string "\\\\" >>> "\\\\\\\\" (match-string 1))) nil nil)))) >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:51:44AM -0500, Dan Davison wrote: >>>> Has anyone worked on reversible transformation between org and >>>> latex? >>>> I'm collaborating on a latex document with some non-org >>>> users. Basically what I'd like to do is transform a latex document >>>> into an org document, fold/unfold sections and edit the document >>>> under >>>> org-mode, and then reconvert to latex. The end result would be as >>>> if >>>> the transformation to org had never happened. >>>> >>>> At its simplest those functions would convert between '\section' >>>> <-> >>>> '* section', '\subsection' <-> '** subsection' etc, but obviously >>>> there's a lot more that could be done such as all the conversions >>>> that >>>> org-export-to-latex does; I imagine that function couldn't be used >>>> directly, but ideally the inverse of the latex->org function would >>>> share conversion code with org-export-to-latex. Does this idea make >>>> sense, and has anyone already worked on this? >>>> >>>> Dan >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list >>>> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >>>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison > > -- > http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 25604 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-19 8:40 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-12-04 16:51 latex <-> org ? Dan Davison 2008-12-04 23:12 ` Dan Davison 2008-12-08 12:39 ` Harri Kiiskinen 2008-12-18 16:50 ` orgstruct minor mode (WAS: latex <-> org ?) Dan Davison 2008-12-19 8:40 ` Carsten Dominik
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).