From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Stegemann Subject: Re: [BUG] HTML exporting numbered literal examples Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:36:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r5wg8lch.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87y6qn9xed.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87zlb2que2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MSrAz-00029w-Bt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:37:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MSrAt-00028O-DR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:36:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55470 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MSrAt-00028L-8k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:36:55 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:58613) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MSrAs-0005Zz-Nm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:36:54 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MSrAr-00041D-Fu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:36:53 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MSrAo-0005bO-7x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:36:50 +0000 Received: from london.zeitform.net ([146.140.213.100]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:36:50 +0000 Received: from ulf-news by london.zeitform.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:36:50 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien wrote: > Ulf Stegemann writes: > >> Right, I agree with your observation but I think I wouldn't with your >> conclusion. I don't think that this is a problem. From the author's >> point of view I think he/she knows what's going on since this is not the >> default behaviour and the `-r' switch actually has to be added. And >> after all we are talking about links. And as with any other link if the >> link target is self-explanatory: fine, then I can use it as link name. If >> it is not, I should choose something less confusing for the reader. > > One problem is the limitation about labels you can use. E.g. labels do > not allow whitespaces. It is hard to write meaningful self-explanatory > link names without using whitespaces. Ah okay, that is a good point indeed. I wasn't aware of the fact that labels could not contain whitespaces. > I will see if I can overcome this in a clean way. That would be great. Thanks for your efforts! Ulf