From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Stegemann Subject: Re: Markup for export question Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:35:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <60986.11703.qm@web28307.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPAeb-0005w7-GC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:36:21 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPAeW-0005u1-4x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:36:20 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58460 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPAeW-0005ty-2H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:36:16 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:2846) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MPAeV-0000ee-Cy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:36:15 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MPAeR-0001Eg-Bn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:36:11 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MPAeN-0000ZB-MS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:36:07 +0000 Received: from london.zeitform.net ([146.140.213.100]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:36:07 +0000 Received: from ulf-news by london.zeitform.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:36:07 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Giovanni, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: > --- Gio 9/7/09, Ulf Stegemann ha scritto: >> When writing documentations I often >> come across expressions like >> >> doMagic('myVariable') >> >> In an ideal world the HTML code for this after exporting the org file >> would look like this: >> >> doMagic('myVariable') >> >> The purpose is of course to indicate that `doMagic' is a literal >> function/method name while `myVariable' is not meant literal and is >> to be replaced something more or less sensible. > > ... did you play with "Literal examples", chapter 12.1 of the manual? > > or "12.6.6 Text areas" ? yes, I'm aware of those but I was rather referring to inline markup not src/example blocks. To make it clearer, imagine something like this: Copy your configuration to /install-dir/conf. Which ideally would be exported as Copy your configuration to /install-dir/conf. This is something where a src/example block is not suitable. Ulf