From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Stegemann Subject: Re: Counter cookies and mixed checkbox lists/subtasks Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:00:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7F5AF424-5413-44D5-A73C-A4BA6B9FB5F9@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvoRB-0003Pc-8U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:01:09 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvoR6-0003PF-HD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:01:08 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50505 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LvoR6-0003PB-83 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:01:04 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:23820) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LvoR5-0006iK-PI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:01:03 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LvoR5-0002sX-5X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:01:03 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LvoR3-0006ht-6l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:01:01 +0000 Received: from london.zeitform.net ([146.140.213.100]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:01:01 +0000 Received: from ulf-news by london.zeitform.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:01:01 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > Hmmm, I am still not convinced, in particular about adding new syntax. > > One thing I could imagine though, is this: > If an entry has checkboxes, always put those into the cookie, not the > children. > Or maybe a variable, stating your preference for this. This would at least > give predictable behavior. or how about a property? Ulf