From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Holst Subject: Re: [gnorb] completion for `gnorb-gnus-incoming-do-todo' Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:38:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87io8ksnix@gmx.de> <8737zosjan.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87wpwzmbb3@gmx.de> <87k2sxxir6.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87pp2o1sbb@gmx.de> <877fovvqh9.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87si7jfgel@gmx.de> <87vbce2yax.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45344) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRG20-0007pF-QB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 04:44:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRG1v-0007ej-RF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 04:44:36 -0400 Received: from imta21.fe.bosch.de ([139.15.243.226]:58377) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRG1v-0007cr-Lj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 04:44:31 -0400 Received: from smtp6-v.fe.bosch.de (imta23.fe.bosch.de [139.15.243.227]) by imta21.fe.bosch.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1D3C0602 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:38:51 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87vbce2yax.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:01:42 +0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Eric, =B7 Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Thomas Holst writes: > >> =B7 Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> >>>> >>>> [ ... snip ... ] >>>> >>>> [ ... snip completion issue with gnorb ... ] >>> > > [...] > >> ok here is what I did to reproduce behavior with ECM > > All right, now that's a bug report! > > I followed your steps, and can confirm the same behavior. Unfortunately= , > I don't really understand what's going on, and don't have time to dive > into helm's guts at the moment. > > Using these exact same settings, but loading helm from the package > manager instead of the git repo, everything works just fine. Would you > consider shifting to use the packaged version of helm (which I can't > believe lags the git repo by more than a couple of days) instead? thanks for confirming the buggy behaviour. I will test the packaged helm version. It will take a few days until I have time to test it. I will report when I have done my tests. -- Regards Thomas