From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles.Sebold@lcms.org (Sebold, Charles) Subject: Re: Making the output of %% functions linkable in agenda views Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 15:04:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87aaf3tv5l.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHLq4-0002o4-2V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 16:04:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHLq2-0002et-Ng for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 16:04:56 -0400 Received: from ctms100.concordiatech.org ([216.88.180.170]:13772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHLq2-0002eP-KX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 16:04:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87aaf3tv5l.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Matt Lundin's message of "Tue, 03 May 2011 15:56:54 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matt Lundin Cc: "Sebold, Charles" , emacs-orgmode On 3 May 2011, Matt Lundin wrote: > The bigger question, however, is why the expression above is even > showing up in the agenda, since it contains no scheduling information. > :) Hm. I didn't think about whether anybody else could see it, come to think of it; my real problem (for which this was just a mock-up) shows up in a heavily customized agenda I set up, which isn't schedule-based. -- Charles Sebold 3rd of May, 2011 GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) No Gnus v0.18 | Org-mode version 7.5 (release_7.5.246.ga35b4)