From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Moreton Subject: Re: Bug: source code editing using C-c ' (org-edit-special) eats characters Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:38:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20121023180317.GA21957@localhost> <877gqfvsol.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TW5pl-0006lZ-FA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:38:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TW5pc-0001uF-Mg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:38:21 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44227) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TW5pc-0001u6-G0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:38:12 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TW5pj-0000jQ-Ip for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:38:19 +0100 Received: from uk.solarflare.com ([193.34.186.16]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:38:19 +0100 Received: from andrewjmoreton by uk.solarflare.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:38:19 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Thu 25 Oct 2012, Bastien wrote: > Hi Hsiu-Khuern, > > Hsiu-Khuern Tang writes: > >> Sorry if this has been reported -- a brief search didn't turn up >> anything. > > this is now fixed -- thanks for reporting this! > > Best, Has this been pushed to org in emacs trunk ? I'm seeing a similar problem in emacs trunk (r110821) where "C-c '" in the *Org Src* buffer closes the source edit window and discards the entire contents of the source block. Should I raise an emacs bug for this ? AndyM