From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id yDPSGMgZ62V91gAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 14:59:36 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id yDPSGMgZ62V91gAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 14:59:36 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1709906376; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=3a09xlGDE2SILrPMdkhtoug3v/Ug4zVqzi0dgralVGw=; b=oXnJ/guyrkd7c9cmC6ySz8Eqveo5XZojRHkOsaik2/dp08aO2lbdKpeLy+zfbMW1Nx84zk e+jw/WFHGUziJvDzq5p5sMP13dRdbqPjZkcUBelXPpoSeatQefjKEEb/mnHNY1k0foyDZc wLLBfxdMBU/mH7bwCj2D3fODSDo4hwXcRVjmO4Mgv3Hk0YYGCSuHykBMxqTUvLMh0ISqhr J/a7tZXjpVGtm3b1/cp3zpEoEcVvDMYB9itHgxMINnnSvpWkGoVRCkWhNUzmYY6+EUyclE 2I870cxMOU4HEVBFBkCHVlhkk0InjQtE8v6iQvNIInqnYoFTxNV5BONQuvKSOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1709906376; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=PXHBCO7cQNWd3zCLjXtzZLY+zaKKhtyg91fkFd5+yMUICIjtv3QyT0Z4I7WZ0NEuL+D3rn qUmBs7ZrDhV/8XR3x7fq8KJFeYALcSNjBJRyPQlK6gkdmsee47ORJVeNq5Dym5a6Gg4Nu9 WMwhpXUI5jVSDSPgEMyW7EPy0KEU4dwEYYFgicPGhXaM4qqMKjF/B7MS88e7J8khWDjmVP u37xV71fJXFnfo1MRB3KqShKwq11j65krCxXPVSpMXuNZSEWK6r+CErbbuDSagF1BxZMUp odlQOJTycKHCjMWYR1+LOoc1OQ5pjiFz/g+nIoLaJ0Vw2UrtyK3qB2R67RB6lA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F161FCA5 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 14:59:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riakD-0004PQ-Va; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 08:58:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riakC-0004P5-KU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 08:58:40 -0500 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riakB-0004Vh-By for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 08:58:40 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1riak7-00035t-Tq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 14:58:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org From: Max Nikulin Subject: Re: false positives: Re: Experimental public branch for inline special blocks Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:58:30 +0700 Message-ID: References: <87wmql6690.fsf@posteo.net> <87msra47y8.fsf@posteo.net> <87sf121e9t.fsf@localhost> <87o7bq2g38.fsf@posteo.net> <8734t2koqc.fsf@localhost> <87h6hi2d51.fsf@posteo.net> <87cys53nt9.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US, ru-RU In-Reply-To: <87cys53nt9.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: 25 X-Spam_score: 2.5 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 1.42 X-Spam-Score: 1.42 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 22F161FCA5 X-TUID: ApFoiYthOa2E On 08/03/2024 01:21, Juan Manuel Macías wrote: >> Ihor Radchenko escribió: >> >>> I am wondering if @@[...]{...} would be better than @_... >>> It should be slightly easier to type. > > Anyway, in the last commit I replaced _ with @. Let's see how it goes... > Now the anonymous variant is @@[...]{...}. Unfortunately the issue, I have reported, has not fixed. I admit, the examples have become more contrived (org-export-string-as "Alpha@Beta{" 'html '(:export-options (body-only))) "

\nAlpha{

\n" (org-export-string-as "Alpha@Beta[" 'html '(:export-options (body-only))) Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p nil)