From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id IIPOM+c4FmURQgAAauVa8A:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 04:39:35 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id IIPOM+c4FmURQgAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 04:39:35 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E41C62C21 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 04:39:35 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1695955175; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=eo9sXVa0hMRWZpoXdH+l1KWu9LkiclHf+0apiX8syQA=; b=DZFuWjUx2/9MWGtsrqpdlEj2HyOpXHVqKKYlRNxKafbVNnbmqdVUYrUHlsM8kgtFQIn9IP /Oi8R7d6IDDFYhUe/OS1V+x/AgRuxDmbyA/XbqaGH05wcavMzLyuR9tFv09Rumf3sT22ei Qve7lkeN+s7K/dZwxRkRR1bgYVCQOTSvnGlzhWzo1qBGQL4gIpAvUKCJvTEWRd8mm4wx+1 arhW7RtNLwdxr2sY5i2TNu1aK9Yo1d2Usu9rtKLj6gI0urpgfPx6fty44/g4+Ku23ybNop x4XwUxKkSUwoexgLJifZV15tgdSXz0lMJW+GzaX5UzogQeG8V1ldMOKsmrgY7Q== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1695955175; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=OAPVhtA28C6i1iTaN2VOiQTqVE9OPjMyTpwJZ5xmEqfz3aFPvoIknhSUIVridt6u3nxCbe J2vlYNlQburoaQg30ml8RrjNpDud/bdepz6qobI2mV+1P5P08rIfdKRbMbwWLb4Azv70YO gwqm1oAXvXzZicimNmOogKw2Zcqk18iVMMqbE4Qul9M5pDtEjBDoY4l8KsK3P3A5ck74I3 N55ZgcQK8HhW/tlkFWQmWvOQuHIMDY5dAlSoBzztN1YQnPTcD0zNSUlOF30iMXP8131kIx 59wbenpUVQfz/Dm6IMCsDykzmB20KwV99yZMHVxKbeqaTLN/2tntRFuRnkz8DA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qm3Oj-0000vx-L8; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 22:38:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qm3Oi-0000vn-5g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 22:38:32 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qm3Og-0007Ae-Qp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 22:38:31 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qm3Od-0008xb-UT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 04:38:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org From: Max Nikulin Subject: Re: [patch] ox-latex.el: Add `LATEX_PRE_HEADER' keyword Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:38:21 +0700 Message-ID: References: <874jjuj8vu.fsf@posteo.net> <87pm2776qq.fsf@posteo.net> <875y3yytp4.fsf@posteo.net> <87r0ml3oax.fsf@tsdye.online> <87lecsvjdd.fsf@posteo.net> <871qeiscmo.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Content-Language: en-US, ru-RU In-Reply-To: <871qeiscmo.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: 13 X-Spam_score: 1.3 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.473, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.64 X-Spam-Score: -2.64 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6E41C62C21 X-TUID: Yi8x964XEsh0 On 28/09/2023 19:31, Juan Manuel Macías wrote: > I think I should insist on what I said in my previous message, with a > copy/paste: > > The thing is that here it is not a question of whether something can be > done in this way or in another better way. This is how a given package > recommends doing it. If the user wants to use that specific package, she/he > will have to follow these instructions. My reading of these instructions: users have 2 options, they either provide .xmpdata files directly or they ask LaTeX to generate it using filecontents* and take responsibility to remove the file when they change metadata. I do not see any words discouraging the former way, while there are warnings concerning pitfalls with the latter approach that still may be convenient in some cases. > It's more. I am thinking, for > example, of the case in which the user has to obtain a * tex file, not a > PDF, because she/he is collaborating with more people who do not use > Org, but do use that code in the * tex document. Perhaps I am wrong in my assumption that in particular case of PDF-X compliant documents, it is unlikely that it is just a single .tex document. If there are more files: graphics, custom packages, included .tex file then an additional separate .xmpdata file is not an issue.