From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Eglen Subject: Re: Status google calendar sync Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:58:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8762t3idd3.fsf@gmx.ch> <4D48E887.20900@gmail.com> <5E7BEB01-1411-4BF4-A36B-C4FF43E55CF6@fastmail.net> <6843D3C6-E3B7-4D31-9F4C-163FA3770D71@fastmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV52f-0007iM-CU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:58:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV52e-00018Q-6y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:58:41 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV52e-00018M-0b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:58:40 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QV52c-0004Fi-J5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:58:38 +0200 Received: from rgc.damtp.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.17.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:58:38 +0200 Received: from S.J.Eglen by rgc.damtp.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:58:38 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Was there any update regarding this interesting topic? I'm keen to get something working - what is current best practice for getting .ics files made by org put onto google calendar, so that I can view them on android? Thanks, Stephen Konrad Hinsen writes: > On 14 Feb 2011, at 22:39, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > >> This would be awesome, and I think this is the path the emacs >> developers should take -- separating emacs into two, the GUI and the >> core elisp interpreter. I'm sure this wouldn't be easy, but imagine > > Emacs already has a batch mode, and very different GUI layers > (terminal, X11, Mac, Windows), so I'd suspect that a "no GUI" version > that can be compiled anywhere would not be so difficult. It may be > more difficult to make a separate GUI layer, but that wouldn't be very > important either from a practical point of view. > > BTW, another Emacs GUI I'd like to see is a Web-based one. Imagine > connecting to your home machine from a Web browser and getting access > to a copy of Emacs running there! > > Konrad. > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode