From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Welle Subject: Re: Unable to resolve link: nil Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 21:34:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <6390D7C2-81B9-4CC8-8FD9-B852966643C1@agrarianresearch.org> <7o3a6dxj3m.ln2@news.c0t0d0s0.de> <87y44txyzw.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQgE7-00022p-PL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:35:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQgE3-00055T-LM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:35:14 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQgE3-00055M-Dz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:35:11 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bQgE0-00039t-T2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 21:35:08 +0200 Received: from dslb-088-066-015-139.088.066.pools.vodafone-ip.de ([88.66.15.139]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 21:35:08 +0200 Received: from mwe012008 by dslb-088-066-015-139.088.066.pools.vodafone-ip.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 21:35:08 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Nick Dokos writes: > Michael Welle writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Vikas Rawal writes: >> >>> Working on long, complex documents, I sometimes have a wrongly pointed >>> link. And when I try to export it, I get the error: "Unable to resolve >>> link: nil”. Is there a straightforward way to find out which link is >>> not resolving? >> good question ;). I spent half an hour this week in a similar situation ;). >> I used bisecting to find the problem. In my case it was a space before >> the protocol: [[ http://foo.bar][foo]]. >> > > (untested) > > Does org-lint help? ah, learned something new here ;). Yes, it catches the space. Regards hmw