From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Seb Subject: Re: GFDL with cover texts Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <9592BB6CDB1CEB48826BE86ACD71FA996ABF79@kwik.ic.uva.nl> Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6UtW-0000eW-UP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:18:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6UtV-0000dY-4G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:18:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35176 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6UtU-0000cX-Lb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:18:00 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:37023 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6UtU-0004R7-0F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:18:00 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1K6UtL-0000qv-3Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:17:51 +0000 Received: from host51.untangle.com ([198.144.196.51]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:17:51 +0000 Received: from seb by host51.untangle.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:17:51 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2008-06-10, Dominik, C. wrote: > I would be happy to dual-license the manual. Does anyone know what > piece of text I would have to put there? Does anyone know if the > GFDL prohbits me, the author, to add GPL as a second free license? > I sure hope not. > [...] > To be honest, I have absolutely no clue what it means, and it was > not my intention to restrict use of the manual in any way when I put > it under the GFDL. Back then I must have thought that this simply > it the proper thing to use for documentation. The GFDL itself is fine, it's the use of Invariant Sections, Cover Texts, etc that make it not-free as far as Debian is concerned. But anyway, if you're the sole author, you can definitely move to a GPL+GFDL dual-license when you so please, but I guess I still need to add that IANAL... Cheers, --Seb