From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wes Hardaker Subject: Re: Suggestion with bad patch for org-remember-templates Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:30:32 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20090103184536.GA2267@yog-sothoth.mohorovi.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJsMJ-0005ht-NR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:31:19 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJsMI-0005hE-4w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:31:19 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40544 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJsMI-0005h3-0W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:31:18 -0500 Received: from dcn236-43.dcn.davis.ca.us ([168.150.236.43]:46431 helo=wes.hardakers.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJsMG-00044O-0x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:31:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090103184536.GA2267@yog-sothoth.mohorovi.cc> (James TD Smith's message of "Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:45:36 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: James TD Smith Cc: emacs-orgmode list >>>>> On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:45:36 +0000, James TD Smith said: JTS> I think I'm about 2/3rds of the way through the refactoring and JTS> adding plist templates. Thanks for the updates to both of you and I'm very much looking forward to the new code! One of the reasons that I have so many remember templates is I almost always have 2 per subject: one that includes a link to the current spot in the current buffer and one that doesn't. Having a multi-stage selection would certainly fix that aspect of the problem. JTS> I have auto-expanding minibuffers turned on (Emacs 22.2) and JTS> haven't noticed any problems with them, so I'd suggest Wes give JTS> them another try. FYI, this was under XEmacs and it was a number of years ago (10+ probably) where if you had too long of a potential buffer it would crash XEmacs (probably when the mini buffer needed to be larger than the original window size or something). I'll try again... -- "In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap, and much more difficult to find." -- Terry Pratchett