emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com>
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@diplan.de>
Subject: Re: bug? org does not seem to sort by prioritiy #A, #B, #C, #D
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:41:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <rmiiq0vd8gd.fsf@fnord.ir.bbn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B2253559-EDBA-4A24-AA95-679EE9539183@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:01:18 +0200")


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 950 bytes --]


Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:

> On Oct 21, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
>
>> My guessing is that a naive user (like me ...) does expect any
>> defined priority (like #D in this case) to have a higher priority
>> than a "non" priority item.
>
> I see how that makes sense.  However, the other use case is this:
>
> Use #A to make something higher priority.  Use #C to make it lower
> than any normal stuff.  All the rest mingles in #B.
>
> So your proposal makes the assumption that any priority means more
> than no priority.

The default aBc settings were easily understandable to me and I use A to
mark things high and C low and leave most things in the middle.

So maybe all that's needed is a "You might expect tasks with an explicit
priority to all be considered higher priority than tasks without an
explicit priority, but in fact unlabeled tasks inherit the default
priority."  Or maybe that's redundant.


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 194 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 201 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-21 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-21  7:01 bug? org does not seem to sort by prioritiy #A,#B,#C,#D Rainer Stengele
2010-10-21  7:07 ` bug? org does not seem to sort by prioritiy #A, #B, #C, #D Carsten Dominik
2010-10-21  7:12   ` Rainer Stengele
2010-10-21  7:21     ` Carsten Dominik
2010-10-21  7:30       ` Rainer Stengele
2010-10-21  7:39         ` Carsten Dominik
2010-10-21  8:52           ` Rainer Stengele
2010-10-21  9:01             ` Carsten Dominik
2010-10-21  9:38               ` Rainer Stengele
2010-10-21 18:07                 ` Samuel Wales
2010-10-21 20:26                   ` Carsten Dominik
2010-10-21 12:41               ` Greg Troxel [this message]
2010-10-21 17:38                 ` Carsten Dominik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=rmiiq0vd8gd.fsf@fnord.ir.bbn.com \
    --to=gdt@ir.bbn.com \
    --cc=carsten.dominik@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=rainer.stengele@diplan.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).