From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 0G8QMrGsV18oaAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:09:21 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id EJH+LbGsV199VAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:09:21 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F5599404CB for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgBL-00018d-3a for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:09:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgAv-00018V-Ul for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:08:53 -0400 Received: from static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de ([116.202.254.214]:44320 helo=ciao.gmane.io) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgAu-0005qm-Hw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:08:53 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgAq-0005HJ-SP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 18:08:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org From: Maxim Nikulin Subject: Re: idea for capture anywhere in x Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:08:42 +0700 Message-ID: References: <87sgbsq2t5.fsf@gmail.com> <87pn6wq1wt.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/08 09:19:29 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: 12 X-Spam_score: 1.2 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.626, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.41 X-TUID: 7TKF7tmlVNuK 08.09.2020 15:03, Diego Zamboni wrote: > > Doom Emacs has an 'org-capture' script that uses emacsclient to > externally invoke a new frame with 'org-capture' in it. Maybe this could > be a good starting point? > > https://github.com/hlissner/doom-emacs/blob/develop/bin/org-capture Thank you for the link. I have found it interesting due to I am unaware what is considered as best practices in relation to invoking of emacsclient. Though I am a bit lazy to try doom-emacs just now. Does the script works correctly if emacs server is already running but with no frames at the moment of script execution? A couple of things I have noticed in the script: - Systemd service file in emacs stops server without redefining of kill-emacs-hook. - Despite it was not exactly the same problem, cleanup in shell script after completion of a child process was discussed in [1]. Some subtle aspects are better highlighted in the non-top rated answer. I suspect, in the case of emacs races might happen in different places. [1] https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/444676 "Forward SIGTERM to child in Bash"