From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Stegemann Subject: Re: Counter cookies and mixed checkbox lists/subtasks Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:08:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7F5AF424-5413-44D5-A73C-A4BA6B9FB5F9@gmail.com> <9037A8BC-E101-4F59-8FD7-E7A40AE633C8@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LwXVa-0005qG-Nb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:08:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LwXVV-0005om-60 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:08:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38893 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LwXVV-0005oj-1Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:08:37 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:15267) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LwXVU-0004Xf-Bj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:08:36 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LwXVR-0001cL-Oa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:08:33 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LwXVK-0000oO-E3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:08:31 +0000 Received: from london.zeitform.net ([146.140.213.100]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:08:26 +0000 Received: from ulf-news by london.zeitform.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:08:26 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Apr 20, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote: > >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >> >>> Hmmm, I am still not convinced, in particular about adding new syntax. >>> >>> One thing I could imagine though, is this: >>> If an entry has checkboxes, always put those into the cookie, not the >>> children. >>> Or maybe a variable, stating your preference for this. This would at >>> least >>> give predictable behavior. >> >> or how about a property? > > You win. > > After your next git update, set the property "COOKIE_DATA" to either "todo" > or "checkbox". great! Works like a charm here. Thank you for the effort. Ulf