From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Fraga, Eric" <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Bug: Wrong syntax in org-mode files with babel fragments in src
 blocks [9.2.6 (9.2.6-4-ge30905-elpaplus @
 /home/lockywolf/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20191021/)]
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:47:21 +0000
Message-ID: <xuu6tv45mkm0.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <87tv7rk0t9.fsf@delllaptop.lockywolf.net>
 <xuu6sgnbld3w.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ftfpbgcl.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58178)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1izHHL-0005Om-BX
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 04:47:28 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1izHHK-0002tN-BM
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 04:47:27 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87ftfpbgcl.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Wed, 05 Feb 2020
 09:14:50 +0100")
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Vladimir Nikishkin <lockywolf@gmail.com>, "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Wednesday,  5 Feb 2020 at 09:14, Bastien wrote:

[...]

> Org-mode sets:
>
>   (modify-syntax-entry ?< "(>")
>   (modify-syntax-entry ?> ")<")
>
> should we adapt Org's default syntax?

Difficult to judge but my gut feeling would be to leave as is.  My use
case involves significant amount of coding, where < and > are logical
operators.  However, for many, these may make more sense as brackets.

--=20
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.3.2-199-ga557cf