Re: The less ambiguous math delimiters in tables

[Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>]

On 03/01/2025 00:32, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Max Nikulin writes:
> 
>> On 31/12/2024 20:32, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>>> | $10 | foo | $\alpha$ |
>>
>> pandoc result matches my expectation:
>>
>> \$10 & foo & \(\alpha\) \\
> 
> How so?
> I just tried

Sorry, I failed to express that the above example is handled perfectly 
by pandoc, while the following one I find unrealistic

> printf '%s\n' '| =10+20 | 30 | =foo= |' | pandoc -f org -t latex

I can not imagine when this construct may emerge in real life. Parsing 
with single cell is questionable, is a kind of pitfall, but still may be 
considered as valid.

Perhaps the following on is better

     | ~0.001 | ~func3(x)~ |

but there are workarounds like

     | \(~0.001\) | ~func3(x)~ |

On the other hand current approach has already known pitfalls (omitting 
links to mailing list messages)

     Descriptive list
     - goal :: src_haskell[:exports code]{monoidBSFold :: FilePath -> IO 
Counts}
     - term :: [[https://example.org][Bread :: Crumbs]]
     Verbatim inside emphasis
     - A _b =c_ d= e_ f
     Links (a workaround is to break emphasis on link borders)
     - /lorem [[https://ormode.org/?oops=1][ipsum]] dolor/
     - /lorem [[https://orgmode.org/,oops][ipsum]] dolor/
     The same with macro
     #+macro: Pathname =$1=
     /Open the file {{{Pathname(~/.bashrc)}}}/