From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glenn Morris Subject: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:41:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <531a7f93882cc0d5d09700457d06ea082f47569b.camel@flqt.fr> <83sh2ck42e.fsf@gnu.org> <87va73gn90.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <83efdqg32d.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59015) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g2Mov-0002vy-3R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:42:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g2Mou-0007ED-Ef for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:42:05 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <83efdqg32d.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:53:14 +0300") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: n@flqt.fr, rms@gnu.org, rjhorniii@gmail.com, 32722@debbugs.gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com I think (or rather assume) that the issue is that GitHub receives a grade F ("unacceptable") evaluation acccording to the GNU Ethical Repository Criteria; https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html. So does SourceForge, by the way. While there are numerous references to GitHub and SourceForge in Emacs (and some components even nominally live there, by the way, eg CEDET, cc-mode...), it's rare (unique?) for running a GNU Emacs command to actually print "hey, go install something from this non-ethical repository to finish doing what you wanted to do". It's a different level of referencing.