From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Bochannek <alexb@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Emphasis font-lock question.
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:04:28 -0700
Message-ID: <uu03ie1cz.fsf@juniper.net>
References: <uu03ietds.fsf@juniper.net>
	<6905fe866ab79ff425d2c7e1ce1a166b@science.uva.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLjmN-0005CS-Om
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 13:04:35 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GLjmL-0005CG-Ah
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 13:04:34 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GLjmL-0005CD-5l
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 13:04:33 -0400
Received: from [207.17.137.64] (helo=colo-dns-ext2.juniper.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.52) id 1GLjmy-0002nL-8j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 13:05:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <6905fe866ab79ff425d2c7e1ce1a166b@science.uva.nl> (Carsten
	Dominik's message of "Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:27:23 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:

> If I remember correctly, these classes are necessary to make emphasis
> work correctly with stacked emphasis, for example */this is italic and
> bold at the same time/*.
>
> I guess I could take them out if stacking is forbidden, in this case
> you example would fontify.

It's OK to me if */foo/* means italic and bold (this is how Gnus
rendered your example), but */foo/bar* shouldn't. Markers, stacked or
otherwise, should come in symmetrical pairs.

Alex.