From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Bochannek Subject: Agenda and tag inheritance. Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:57:33 -0800 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GepRH-0005wt-3a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:57:43 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GepRF-0005v2-FZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:57:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GepRF-0005un-9n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:57:41 -0500 Received: from [207.17.137.57] (helo=colo-dns-ext1.juniper.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.52) id 1GepRF-0007RI-3l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:57:41 -0500 Received: from magenta.juniper.net (magenta.juniper.net [172.17.28.122]) by colo-dns-ext1.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id k9V8vdX90889 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:57:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alexb@juniper.net) Received: from ALEXB-LT ([172.23.1.114]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id k9V8vXE49743 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:57:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alexb@juniper.net) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Any comments on this? Alex. --=-=-= Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline From: Alex Bochannek To: emacs-orgmode Subject: Agenda and tag inheritance. Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:53:59 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 I am wondering about how tag inheritance is supposed to work in practical terms. I recall that there was some discussion about this in the past, but I don't think there was resolution. I use the default setting of org-use-tag-inheritance t and org-tags-match-list-sublevels nil. That means that if I want to have something at a sublevel show up in a tag sparse tree, I have to tag it with the same tag as it's upper level. I am not sure if setting org-tags-match-list-sublevels would be useful since the sublevels wouldn't stand out enough. How about sparse trees with tags on sublevels different from their inherited tags? I think it would be useful if the levels leading to the sublevel could also be shown. Inheritence for todo items doesn't work very well for me. It would be really nice if the todo agenda view could show the inherited levels somehow since I end up tagging those items with the tags of their upper levels as well. Just some thoughts. Alex. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --=-=-=--