From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id iN1+FhzkWGXFWwEAauVa8A:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 17:19:40 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id iN1+FhzkWGXFWwEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 17:19:40 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29C57247C0 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 17:19:40 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1700324380; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Bwf+s4KfdhklhxU5YgsAhw9/sg8PbZD70vYmJ1KWZMRDa6zjeQVfrjlQPECPx9E9b0epNp KKLrp5oQqcF+pwGdMZmIt9eT1b6oLSelQPCA7fxdqB/Ntn+XGkTS5BMbXASasPr3XZxjPr mA7QLqcOatVZW4uh4EKfmaUB6iS3ndasqf/tu7gJ+u+xUqCJiMfJI3EphouYGPZTWHI4FJ X9yFhXENg/VvUEpGD45azgz91FvFeHbT/0yliRbcAr8nY70S2JKw/WZdBE5DH9nHyIX3ZH MsQq/RVg9vF/gL66v0cpWIirwjUaa6/NhzgXoe0Tj375zNcHUcD4khy8l9+miA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1700324380; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=uAhfwcLgDAwXpALXm1KVoVCZ3dinJN2Mpk5xglahD5E=; b=Q0ALh+XM/XdGVanZChajWXAWVEj5hpNNUOnsAvG3E3pJjKkpGIf5FmG+/n8jZtO9s+7/YR urxPX1uaZOXoIx/kTzKJk5wOcslbqiNC8nr7MOY9q/IDg/85RoVUriyfThBDvnuGJZLInj 5n5T1AsFpY/P1AvfsWomiIvWw41LJzczCAL7eN8XjaT5/vLeG6fd7P1fVyNfQj8Kdswzzq oSPXIvIaLC8L3B2pKLIrkc5iSHd7bb/F/RxB0PO5RcwZDxxN7dQMNpH9zJqMaNHf2fC7E6 d2wbQkwumhHm8JTQSd8mRJbSk4sn0M2PJ0ev0w/IWS6dCscU0TpeBn3HbdfODA== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r4O1y-0004RO-TI; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:18:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r4O1x-0004RC-DX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:18:49 -0500 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r4O1v-0002Th-Mb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:18:49 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r4O1t-000AQI-GT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 17:18:45 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org From: Max Nikulin Subject: Re: bash source code block: problem after ssh commands Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 23:18:35 +0700 Message-ID: References: <25912.63830.726070.953843@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87o7gldb78.fsf@localhost> <25914.26693.101108.954656@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87fs1xbis1.fsf@localhost> <25916.238.191509.652552@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <653f8a93.050a0220.f2202.5816@mx.google.com> <87zfzr2ejj.fsf@localhost> <18ba5e231e3.f989cde147196.3154436412643995109@excalamus.com> <875y2e2b9y.fsf@localhost> <18bb07473e2.1007b1565819307.6938164403009000496@excalamus.com> <877cmr2ke4.fsf@localhost> <18bb5337346.dfcd5ebb1139895.801408740607633332@excalamus.com> <18bd3d38ff3.115b786cb2560022.7704006411630399228@excalamus.com> <87fs169h7f.fsf@localhost> <18bd984270d.1048050a22954105.2819987720224062869@excalamus.com> <25942.29051.701153.391260@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <18bd9ea2f7b.b77346232985684.5614027527324280790@excalamus.com> <871qcod9ad.fsf@localhost> <25943.14504.245343.443507@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87sf54bs61.fsf@localhost> <87v89z1gvk.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US, ru-RU In-Reply-To: <87v89z1gvk.fsf@localhost> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: 28 X-Spam_score: 2.8 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 29C57247C0 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.95 X-Spam-Score: -3.95 X-TUID: JdbAY2NDgs7Z On 18/11/2023 17:43, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > > I still see it as a bug - what Org mode does to run the shell blocks is > not what users expect. _By default_, we _should_ produce more expected > behavior. A shell without unexpected behavior is neither POSIX nor a descendant shell like BASH https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls Behavior if interactive and non-interactive shells is not the same anyway. > I cannot find any clear motivation behind using `process-file' + INFILE > in the git logs. I assume that it was used simply because it is easier > compared to trying to create and run temporary script file on remote > hosts. From my point of view it is rather natural to use `process-file' since this function is available out of the box. I suspect some subtle issues may appear even if script file is forced. On the other hand ob-shell already has a (bit buggy) implementation relying on script files. It is used when :stdin or :cmdline is specified.