Re: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system

[Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>]

On 08/06/2022 09:02, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Max Nikulin writes:
> 
> Can you (and other interested users) try the following value of
> org-script-display and let me know if it looks acceptable:
> 
> (defconst org-script-display  '(;; The values are tweaked to not change
>                                  ;; the line height.
>                                  ((raise -0.1)  (height 0.7))
> 				((raise 0.25)  (height 0.7))

I do not mind. High symbols like "(|)" cross middle line a bit, but 
since it is not TeX and superscript can not be above subscript it should 
not cause any problem with overlapping.

>                                  ;; Alternative properties for tables.
>                                  ;; FIXME: We cannot change the text
>                                  ;; height because it will alter the
>                                  ;; symbol width and thus break the
>                                  ;; table alignment (at least, until
>                                  ;; org table are aligned via pixel
>                                  ;; width).
> 				((raise -0.5))
> 				((raise 0.5)))

The issue with increased vertical space between vertical bars might be 
alleviated a bit by using e.g. 0.35 instead of 0.5. I hope, subscripts 
and superscripts are still distinguishable.

>>>      However, it currently uses x1.5 line height for tables creating empty
>>>      space between vertical | separators. It looks like a typo for me. It
>>>      would make more sense to make table lines compact, not vice versa. Am
>>>      I missing something?
>>
>> git blame gives 0618aeafb39dbf78e753348eaeaddbb7f8104cd0
>> It seems smaller font breaks horizontal alignment in tables.
> 
> Thanks! Now it is crystal clear what was the reason behind the different
> fontification inside/outside the tables. I will add the explanation to
> comments.