From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Seb Subject: Re: GFDL with cover texts Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <484C8EAC.2050000@gmx.de> Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6TQp-0000gF-Oy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:44:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6TQn-0000cX-W9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:44:19 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46377 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6TQn-0000c8-Tp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:44:17 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:51448 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6TQn-00011u-B9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:44:17 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1K6TQh-00058F-2X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:44:11 +0000 Received: from host51.untangle.com ([198.144.196.51]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:44:11 +0000 Received: from seb by host51.untangle.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:44:11 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2008-06-09, Sebastian Rose wrote: > just a question: > > When I follow the link you mentioned in your first mail I read this: > > ----8<------- > It should be noted that this does not imply any hostility towards the > Free Software Foundation, and does not mean that GFDL documentation > should not be considered free enough by others, and Debian itself will > continue distributing GFDL documentation in its non-free section. > ---->8------- > > Debain users are used to look for documentation non-free section (gcc, > bash, bison, auto-tools, glibc, php, gdb, emacs-lisp ...). Is it a > problem to simply put the docs there? it means maintaining two source packages, which is far from optimal for something that moves as fast as org-mode. It could definitely be done, but I am not exactly thrilled by the idea :) Cheers, --Seb