Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> Ruijie Yu <ruijie@netyu.xyz> writes:
>
>>> Compiler list may also be nil.
>>
>> This should be covered by the repeat case?  Unless you want to be explicit
>> about this, in which case you can wrap it in a choice, whose first choice
>> being (const :tag “description” nil), and the second choice being the repeat
>> case.
>
> Yes, explicit tag will be better.

Updated and rebased (cleanly) onto current main.  Note that I moved the
type into a new line to keep everything below 66 columns.