From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wes Hardaker Subject: Re: OrgmodeOrg-export-generic and wikis... Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:57:32 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4BD88EC7.5070507@sift.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O7UFH-0007m9-UC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:57:39 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45785 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7UFF-0007ll-Mm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:57:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7UFB-0004iM-4Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:57:37 -0400 Received: from mail.hardakers.net ([168.150.236.43]:39484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7UFA-0004iH-Ur for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:57:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BD88EC7.5070507@sift.info> (Robert Goldman's message of "Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:38:47 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: rpgoldman@sift.info Cc: Org Mode >>>>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:38:47 -0500, Robert Goldman said: RG> 1. Would it be reasonable to move the documentation for RG> org-export-generic into the contrib/ directory of org-mode? It RG> seems ... suboptimal to have this package be maintained in the org RG> git repo, but its documentation in the worg git repo. At least from RG> my PoV this raises the bar for keeping the documentation up-to-date RG> and synchronized to a pretty high level. I'll let Carsten answer questions like that ;-) RG> 2. Is the existing "handle each line separately" algorithm going to RG> permit us to handle faces correctly? Seems like we'll need a lot of RG> hair to handle, e.g., a phrase in italics that straddles a line-break, RG> won't we? Well, that's a good question and one I don't have a great answer for. We could switch the parser to be multi-line based regexp matches but I suspect the complexity of when to stop those regexps will get rather harry too! -- Wes Hardaker My Pictures: http://capturedonearth.com/ My Thoughts: http://pontifications.hardakers.net/