On Fri, Mar 18 2011, Nick Dokos wrote:

> That was of course before you took out the concat in 9216453a388 - after
> that change, there is no problem: it was doing (concat nil) ==> ""

What's weird is that that concat has not been introduced by my recent
patches. It clearly seems wrong, but I don't see why no bug was
triggered before.

Anyhow, if everything is ok now, that's perfect. :)

-- 
Julien Danjou
❱ http://julien.danjou.info