From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrea Crotti Subject: Re: [Org-contacts] 3 2 1 go? Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:57:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34997 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PwtfJ-0005Kn-K7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:57:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PwtfG-0006J6-GO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:57:16 -0500 Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.7.73]:61433) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PwtfG-0006Io-At for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:57:14 -0500 Received: from ironport-out-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.40]) by mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008)) with ESMTP id <0LHQ002ZCGZC5P80@mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:57:12 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: Julien Danjou Julien Danjou writes: > > Well, do not count on me for that. I use git, it does the job. :) Sure I also do ;) For synchronization I meant between different programs/protocol not different machines... When everything will work it won't be too necessary, but at least to switch to some importers are necessary imho. > > Well, I had some but they are defcustom anyway, so there's no standard. > I do not want to put too much obligation on the format used, because > Org-mode is about organizing stuff the way you want. > > For example, some people might want to cut the address part in > (STREET,ZIPCODE,CITY,COUNTRY) whereas I think it's a burden, I just put > a LOCATION property with all the address in it. In the end, it does not > matter for org-contacts. I agree on that sure, but it would not harm to define some templates of fields to make it immediately usable as a full "normal" address book. > Sure that'd be cool. But I don't have such a phone unfortunately, so > can't help. :) I'll try something out as soon as possible, I'm sick of my actual situation...