From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrea Crotti Subject: Re: patch org-mode Makefile - solve a couple debian build problems and a slackware build problem Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:08:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8739ii885d.fsf@gnu.org> <21342.1310116208@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87y6092k95.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf7zG-0001bj-C2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 06:08:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf7zE-0007hy-I5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 06:08:41 -0400 Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.7.73]:61493) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf7zE-0007hi-3J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 06:08:40 -0400 Received: from ironport-out-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.40]) by mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008)) with ESMTP id <0LO000MJPEUDLE00@mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:08:37 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <87y6092k95.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Jude DaShiell , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > > Indeed. I'll apply every patch that > > - doesn't break current Makefile commands > - does add a new func (even tiny) for specific distro > > Please send some :) One way to make the whole deployment really portable could also be to pass from plain Makefile to the autoconf beast. This would also be good to detect the Emacs version and existing external libraries which maybe needed. A few other extensions already do and I think it would decrease greatly the amount of code needed (even if it would increase the "hidden complexity").