From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arkady Grudzinsky Subject: Re: tsia-up sorting strategy sorts agenda by date and ignores time. How can I change that? Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:25:27 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87shm6wo2p.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45973) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqj5G-0007S2-4F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:26:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqj5C-0004Lb-Gc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:26:02 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=57885 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqj5C-0004LC-AG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:25:58 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqj52-0007yq-OJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:25:48 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Tue, Mar 21 2017, Matt Lundin wrote: > You could use something like this and then add user-defined-up or > user-defined-down where desired in org-agenda-sorting-strategy: > > (defun my-sort-by-inactive-timestamp-incl-time (a b) > (let* ((ma (get-text-property 1 'org-marker a)) > (mb (get-text-property 1 'org-marker b)) > (tsa (with-current-buffer (marker-buffer ma) > (org-entry-get (marker-position ma) "TIMESTAMP_IA"))) > (tsb (with-current-buffer (marker-buffer mb) > (org-entry-get (marker-position mb) "TIMESTAMP_IA"))) > (seca (if tsa (org-time-string-to-seconds tsa) 0)) > (secb (if tsb (org-time-string-to-seconds tsb) 0))) > (cond ((> seca secb) 1) > ((> secb seca) -1) > (t nil)))) > > (setq org-agenda-cmp-user-defined 'my-sort-by-inactive-timestamp-incl-time) > > I imagine there are ways to do this more elegantly (e.g., by iterating > over a and b), but this gets the job done for me. This works. Awesome! Thanks. -- Arkady