From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aDd6J+dMqV9UaAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 14:06:31 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id AL1HI+dMqV8qOAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 14:06:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366CC9404E0 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59472 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kc7oU-0007Jm-06 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 09:06:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kc7mg-0006oJ-Et for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 09:04:38 -0500 Received: from static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de ([116.202.254.214]:55248 helo=ciao.gmane.io) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kc7me-0000Za-Su for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 09:04:38 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kc7mT-0000JO-7A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 15:04:25 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org From: Maxim Nikulin Subject: Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 21:04:19 +0700 Message-ID: References: <20201101161317.GA6609@maokai> <87imaoekrz.fsf@web.de> <39fb1f8d-4407-9359-ad14-72ae7841fda9@grinta.net> <87tuu85djy.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/09 08:01:24 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: 28 X-Spam_score: 2.8 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.41 X-TUID: L5oT5SmeUlfo 2020-11-08 Jean Louis wrote: > That is right, I am using it since years in ~/.mailcap that works well > for mutt email client. > > text/org; emacsclient %s; nametemplate=%s.org; > text/x-org; emacsclient %s; nametemplate=%s.org; Just for curiosity, couldn't it lead to execution of arbitrary code placed into elisp table expressions, some macro, etc.? I have not convinced myself that just opening of a file (without executing of src blocks) is safe enough and there no dangerous #+startup options or other tricks. Emacs is too powerful and too flexible...