From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Troxel Subject: Re: bulk rescheduling change? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:29:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mx0vi81a.fsf@altern.org> <8103.1347464053@alphaville> <8419.1347464859@alphaville> <87ligfxlk1.fsf@altern.org> <9459.1347467106@alphaville> <87627jxkvs.fsf@altern.org> <2861.1347471570@alphaville> <3596.1347473565@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <3920.1347474577@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <5589.1347480129@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <5838.1347481364@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <87oblaq0ly.fsf@altern.org> <3948.1347503982@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE1bq-0002NC-14 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:29:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE1bo-0005cd-6v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:29:17 -0400 Received: from fnord.ir.bbn.com ([192.1.100.210]:49785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE1bo-0005cO-3C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:29:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3948.1347503982@alphaville> (Nick Dokos's message of "Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:39:42 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nick Dokos writes: > Bastien wrote: > >> Hi Nick, >>=20 >> Nick Dokos writes: >>=20 >> > Well, the non-interactiveness and the next day are because the four >> > items I marked were the last four items for that date, so after marking >> > them, the cursor happened to be on the date line for the next day, whi= ch >> > apparently is taken as an indication that I want things to be >> > rescheduled for that date, no questions asked. Not sure I like this >> > much. >>=20 >> This implementation was to mimick the previous behavior we had with=20 >> `k m' (to mark an entry) then `k s' (to schedule it to the date at=20 >> point with no prompt.) >>=20 >> I don't like having no prompt here too.=20=20 >>=20 >> I just changed the behavior so that there is *always* a prompt=20 >> with `m m m B s' -- if the cursor is on a date, this date is the >> default time for the prompt, RET will reschedule to this date. >>=20 > > Thanks - this sounds much better. I hope Greg likes it too. > I ran a bunch of things past it and it worked perfectly (imo of course). Yes, I have updated and the new behavior seems sensible and intuitive. There's a default shown, but if I type anything it's ignored. Thanks for fixing this. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (NetBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlBYr2oACgkQ+vesoDJhHiWdUQCfVHMBIvBVIQvrVq2g2+5ybuN7 3Q8An0ldj4wC6p7rKgZexi68rvIApQ1I =Ridy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--