From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glenn Morris Subject: bug#10125: 24.0.91; package.el (org): Macros in tar packages & order of byte compilation Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:19:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: <81pqgh90sp.fsf@gmail.com> <81ipm9l9kd.fsf@gmail.com> <87r50w47o3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39037) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RU0Nt-0004QP-Jy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:20:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RU0Ns-0007VT-K2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:20:25 -0500 Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87r50w47o3.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:07:40 +0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Cc: 10125@debbugs.gnu.org, stelian.iancu@gmail.com, Jambunathan K Chong Yidong wrote: > This uses the Emacs executable on the exec path, which might not be the > correct one. Yes; I wondered if (car command-line-args) was a reliable way to find the actual name of the running Emacs binary?