From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Pluim Subject: org-capture and XEmacs, indenting too far Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:09:54 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43428 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNf4l-0006TP-MQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:18:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNNAB-0007bS-11 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 05:10:20 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNNAA-0007bM-Ni for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 05:10:18 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNNA6-00076Q-Da for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:10:14 +0100 Received: from lns-bzn-49f-81-56-191-143.adsl.proxad.net ([81.56.191.143]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:10:14 +0100 Received: from rpluim by lns-bzn-49f-81-56-191-143.adsl.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:10:14 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, I'm using XEmacs 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" d27c1ee1943b+ [Lucid] (i686-pc-cygwin, Mule) of Mon Oct 18 2010 on RPluim, with the following org-capture-templates (("t" "Todo" entry (file+headline "~/org/notes.org" "Tasks") "* TODO %?")) The problem is that for some reason the resulting TODO heading is has 2 extra spaces, and is placed at too deep a level, giving: * Tasks *** TODO a task I've tested this on a fairly recent emacs24 build, and everything works fine there, so this is probably something XEmacs specific. Can anyone suggest any way to track this down (I'd bisect, but I've yet to find a 'good' version)? Thanks Robert