From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matti De Craene Subject: Re: [Patch] M-Right and M-Left behave differently on headings and list items Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:37:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <42881A23-3B5E-4423-B068-F543CE5B6AA7@gmail.com> <87ljchrkwp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <27D37EBD-C23A-42B9-80F4-417E45F552E6@gmail.com> <87tyr3kd38.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O539m-0005wF-PG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:37:54 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34210 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O539j-0005uU-N1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:37:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O539e-0003hK-HF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:37:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:61939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O539e-0003h3-Ck for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:37:46 -0400 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so156963wyf.0 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:37:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87tyr3kd38.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Hello Carsten, Bastien, others, >> Excellent question. I think the cleanest would be that M-left/right >> on a folded item that does have children throws an error. I see two alternatives to showing an error: (a) First unfold, then proceed with M-left/right (b) Act as if M-S-left/right was called ( =3D current behaviour of folded list items) Personally, I like (a) somewhat more than showing error. Then again, in most cases I would manually unfold first anyway to see what's below the parent. Matti On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Bastien wro= te: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> Excellent question. =A0I think the cleanest would be that M-left/right >> on a folded item that does have children throws an error. > > +1 > > -- > =A0Bastien >