From: "Peter Neilson" <neilson@windstream.net>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: orgmode for many continuous tasks?
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:58:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.y64d60f8rns8nc@odin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170925072151.GA18049@reactor-core.org>
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 03:21:51 -0400, Mycroft Jones
<mycroft@reactor-core.org> wrote:
> I'm wondering if org-mode can do this:
>
> I have many tasks. Some are one off. But many are tasks that will take
> a
> period of time, days, weeks, months. I need to schedule a bit of time
> every
> day. Over time I can complete the tasks by plugging away. But I have
> so many.
> Half hour chunks work for some tasks, 1 or 2 or 3 hour chunks work best
> for others.
>
> 1) writing 3 different books
> 2) learning 2 different languages
> 3) 2 different types of exercise exercise
> 4) 3 different ongoing tasks at work
> 5) watching videos that friends send me
> 6) reading books on my night stand
> 7) various one-off tasks
> 8) scheduled items, where I have to do them at a scheduled time.
>
> So, for each broad category of task, there are subtasks. So far, it
> looks like
> orgmode is good. But, what I'd like is to automatically generate
> scheduling
> suggestions for the day. For instance, if I've been putting too much
> time into
> languages, then schedule more time for writing the books. And if I've
> focused
> too much on one book, remind me to put time into another book. I'd like
> the
> scheduler to be a sort of time-accounting system that suggests work for
> the day
> in a way that balances the tree.
>
> Within each branch of the tree, I'd like the branches to be allocated
> roughly
> equal time, over a period of weeks and months, on a day to day basis.
>
> Is there a simple workflow in orgmode that can do this? I haven't done
> elisp
> for 10 years, but I'm comfortable with it. Would this be simple to
> implement?
>
> Mycroft
Hmmm. I have similar problems, but on a somewhat more difficult level. A
lot of my tasks are farm-related and are thus self-driven rather than
org-mode-driven. For instance, two barn roofs need repair, and seeing them
listed as TODO in an agenda does nothing to get started on them, or on the
sub-tasks necessary to starting the work on the roofs. But when I look at
the roofs, and thus am reminded of "* TODO Repair barn roofs", it's always
when I'm already at work on something immediately more pressing.
But it gets worse! If I think of a task that needs to be done, and write
it into one of my TODO lists, then I tend to ignore it. Adding it to the
schedule dismisses it from any immediate concern, and (as I alluded
before) much of my work is outside, on the farm, nowhere near my computer.
It's almost like Ko-Ko's solution in G&S's operetta 'The Mikado':
Ko-Ko: When Your Majesty says "Let a thing be done", it’s as good as
done, practically it is done, because Your Majesty’s will is law. Your
Majesty says "Kill a gentleman", and the gentleman is to be killed,
consequently that gentleman is as good as dead, practically he is dead,
and if he is dead, why not say so?
The Mikado: I see. [Dramatic Pause] Nothing could possibly be
more...satisfactory!
My problem with org mode itself thus becomes yet another action item (to
be ignored):
* TODO Devise a way to project my agenda (in unavoidable brilliance) onto
the side of the barn, or perhaps embroider it into the fleece of my sheep
(who * TODO need to be shorn).
Plausible (or implausible) solutions to my problem or to Mycroft's are
hereby solicited.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-25 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-25 7:21 orgmode for many continuous tasks? Mycroft Jones
2017-09-25 11:58 ` Peter Neilson [this message]
2017-09-25 12:07 ` Neil Jerram
2017-09-25 16:34 ` Mycroft Jones
2017-09-25 22:08 ` Tim Cross
2017-09-26 0:40 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-09-26 10:30 ` Melleus
2017-09-26 17:36 ` Mycroft Jones
2017-09-26 18:56 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-09-27 16:14 ` Melleus
2017-09-27 17:02 ` Mycroft Jones
2017-09-27 17:13 ` Peter Neilson
2017-09-26 19:41 ` Eduardo Mercovich
2017-09-25 20:28 ` Mikhail Skorzhinskii
2017-09-25 20:34 ` Mikhail Skorzhinskii
2017-09-27 23:24 ` Bob Newell
2017-09-28 5:48 ` Eric S Fraga
2017-10-03 23:04 ` Mycroft Jones
2017-10-04 5:38 ` Eric S Fraga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.y64d60f8rns8nc@odin \
--to=neilson@windstream.net \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).