From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Robert Klein" Subject: Re: Re: Bug: (REVISED) trouble with updated latex export [6.35 (release_6.35a.26.g78cc)] Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:46:33 +0300 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NzP2B-0006qQ-NQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:46:43 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36332 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzP2A-0006pp-DR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:46:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzP29-0003O6-7D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:46:42 -0400 Received: from gate1.mpip-mainz.mpg.de ([194.95.63.248]:29585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzP29-0003Nz-0F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:46:41 -0400 Received: from [10.20.2.71] (port=48784 helo=vmmail.mpip-mainz.mpg.de) by gate1.mpip-mainz.mpg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzP23-0001Y8-1a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:46:35 +0200 Received: from pckr105.mpip-mainz.mpg.de ([10.20.70.201]) by vmmail.mpip-mainz.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1NzP22-0004CD-TV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:46:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 07.04.2010, 09:43 Uhr, schrieb Austin Frank : > On Wed, Apr 07 2010, Robert Klein wrote: > >> Also, when I put >> >> (add-to-list 'org-export-latex-packages-alist '("" "listings")) > > What's the value of `org-export-latex-listings'? Carsten, how should > listings be addressed in the new setup? > It happens (-ed) with both t and nil. However Carstens newest fix seems to have fixed this, too. Best regards Robert