From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: org-cite and org-citeproc Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 20:26:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87twx5hs2x.fsf@berkeley.edu> <871tk560p3.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <878uedgeuq.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4mckh1p.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87r3s261to.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87wq1uef9f.fsf@berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ydkkc-0001A6-5L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 15:26:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdkkX-0002mx-Nc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 15:26:02 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdkkX-0002ml-Gw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 15:25:57 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YdkkW-0006FG-4Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 21:25:56 +0200 Received: from cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([81.102.136.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 21:25:56 +0200 Received: from andreas.leha by cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 21:25:56 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Richard Lawrence writes: > Hi Eric and all, > > Eric S Fraga writes: > >> On Wednesday, 1 Apr 2015 at 08:49, Andreas Leha wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> I am a happy biblatex user for all my 'own' documents. But (as was >>> mentioned previously) scientific journals that accept latex submissions >>> will require bibtex and won't support biblatex. So, I'd say that one of >>> the other methods (preferably bibtex) is still necessary. >> >> Ahhh, yes, I'd forgotten that journals expect bibtex. This is a key >> requirement for me as well therefore. > > Can someone suggest how a parenthetical citation with common prefix and > suffix data, like > > [(cite): For more on this topic, see:; @Work1 for a review; @Work2; > and references therein.] > > should map to plain BibTeX? Maybe there is no general answer to this > question, but what would a reasonable default be? Maybe this? > > (For more on this topic, see: \cite{Work1} for a review, \cite{Work2}, > and references therein.) > > That is, just place the prefix and suffix data in the surrounding text, > inserting commas after the part for each individual work, and wrapping > the whole thing in parentheses? > To me that seems a reasonable thing to do. At least I would write it probably in such a way. Depending on the citation style ("author, year") I might add a comma after the citation, so that it becomes (For more on this topic, see: Max Mustermann, 2015, for a review, The Internet Consortium, 2014, and references therein.) compared to (For more on this topic, see: Max Mustermann, 2015 for a review, The Internet Consortium, 2014 and references therein.) But: - I am no native English speaker and comma placement in English is very unclear to me - my citation requirements are quite low, I guess... Best, Andreas