From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: [lint] imagemagick Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:49:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: <878u4trvlt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57005) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9Zxp-0001qx-Az for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:55:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9Zxk-0003Mj-7m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:55:29 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9Zxk-0003MH-1E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:55:24 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a9ZxQ-00071I-4t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:55:04 +0100 Received: from 193.63.221.204 ([193.63.221.204]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:55:04 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by 193.63.221.204 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:55:04 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Andreas Leha writes: > >> I get a spurious linting warning >> ,---- >> | high Unknown header argument ":imagemagick" >> `---- >> >> While that header argument should be valid for latex blocks. > > Assuming possible values for :imagemagick are nil and t, this is now > fixed in master. > Thanks a lot! I am not sure about the possible values, though. babel header arguments usually take 'yes' and 'no' as values for TRUE and FALSE. Examples are :tangle, :comments, etc. So, I have been using ':imagemagick yes' until now. But on the other hand ':imagemagick no' is not doing the expected thing. Regards, Andreas