From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Holst <thomas.holst@de.bosch.com>
Subject: Re: [bug] org block not correctly exported to LaTeX
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:50:00 +0200
Message-ID: <o.ywodk4b5edt3@de.bosch.com>
References: <o.ywodaac7hmdp@de.bosch.com> <87zkk3tgry.fsf@gnu.org>
	<o.ywod4o2ahjoi@de.bosch.com> <87tyaajnji.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38700)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Thomas.Holst@de.bosch.com>) id 1QlbT7-00057o-Ci
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:50:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Thomas.Holst@de.bosch.com>) id 1QlbT6-0002MW-8z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:50:17 -0400
Received: from smtp2-v.fe.bosch.de ([139.15.237.6]:20984)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Thomas.Holst@de.bosch.com>) id 1QlbT6-0002MM-2Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:50:16 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87tyaajnji.fsf@gmail.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Mon, 25
	Jul 2011 19:08:33 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Cc: "Holst Thomas (DGS-EC/ESE4)" <Thomas.Holst@de.bosch.com>, Bastien <bzg@altern.org>

Hi Eric,

thanks for looking into this.

=B7 Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Holst <thomas.holst@de.bosch.com> writes:
>> Hi Bastien,
>>
>> thanks for your answer.=20
>>
>>>> when the follwing org-file is exported to LaTeX, #+BEGIN_ORG
>>>> and #+END_ORG is inserted in the tex-file.
>>>
>>> You surely want
>>> #+begin_src org
>>> #+end_src org
>>> "#+begin_org" doesn't exist.
>>
>> #+BEGIN_ORG=20
>> #+END_ORG
>>
>> gets inserted by org-babel.
>
> Yes, Babel uses the #+begin/end_org as markers, so that it can identify
> the beginning and end of raw Org-mode results when those results need t=
o
> be deleted or replaced with new results.
>
> Since these are just used as markers and are functionally equivalent to
> comment lines (e.g., no special treatment of the portion between the
> begin_org and end_org lines) we didn't really coordinate this with the
> results of Org-mode.
>
> It seems however that since comments must start on the first character
> of a line, these don't work when indented.
>
> Would it be difficult to recognize these two lines as comments when the=
y
> are indented?  Note we also have #+begin/end_result lines which may
> likely have similar issues.

This exactly is the issue. If I remove the indentation from the result
block export works fine. As you mentioned #+begin/#+end_org markers are
treated as comments and do not appear in the LaTeX output.

I tried to find a solution to this but my lisp is not (yet) good enough.

--=20
Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen / Best regards=20

Thomas Holst=20
DGS-EC/ESE4

Tel.   +49 (711) 811-40681
PC-Fax +49 (711) 811-5182208