From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Riley Subject: Re: taking note when clocking out Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:40:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4DA69AAA.9040707@gmail.com> <83ei552q9h.fsf@yahoo.it> <831v152fd5.fsf@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QALrj-0000Ct-Bm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:41:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QALri-0000bB-Hf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:41:43 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QALri-0000av-Ay for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:41:42 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QALrg-0004wn-2s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:41:40 +0200 Received: from 85.183.18.158 ([85.183.18.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:41:40 +0200 Received: from rileyrg by 85.183.18.158 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:41:40 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Giovanni Ridolfi writes: > Richard Riley writes: > > Hi, Richard, > nice solution. >> >> btw, when entering a tag "-" is illegal? > > yes, underscore should be used. > > 1. from the manual: > Tags are normal words containing letters, numbers, `_', > and `@'. > > 2. from the source ;-) > org-set-tags in org.el > tags (org-re "[^[:alnum:]_@#%]+")) > (line 12959) > > and few lines (12950) up + or - are used in the search, see > section "Match syntax" under "Matching tags and properties" > in the manual. > > Hope that explains. > yeah, I completely had a brain fart over that one. I did actually know that but .. forgot ... ;) ps I have signed fsf papers if that little utility snippet is any good (ok, will need a defvar I guess for the tag used).