From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matti De Craene Subject: Re: [Patch] M-Right and M-Left behave differently on headings and list items Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:07:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <42881A23-3B5E-4423-B068-F543CE5B6AA7@gmail.com> <87ljchrkwp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <27D37EBD-C23A-42B9-80F4-417E45F552E6@gmail.com> <87tyr3kd38.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <72102D19-9F0C-4C48-9695-E18A1955EF5C@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O6WSW-0005Ko-Le for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:07:20 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59143 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6WSV-0005HN-CQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:07:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6WSU-0004tU-3A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:07:19 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:54942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6WST-0004tG-U0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:07:18 -0400 Received: by wwb13 with SMTP id 13so803638wwb.0 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:07:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <72102D19-9F0C-4C48-9695-E18A1955EF5C@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Bastien Thank you Carsten! --=20 I think I noticed one small bug - possibly introduced by this change. Minimal example: * test - item a - item b Then: M-Right / M-left is not possible on list item b, if that item is on the last line of the org file. (M-S-Left/Right are possible) Kind Regards, Matti On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Bastien wrote: > >> Carsten Dominik writes: >> >>> Excellent question. =A0I think the cleanest would be that M-left/right >>> on a folded item that does have children throws an error. >> >> +1 > > > This is how it now works. > >> >> -- >> Bastien > > - Carsten > > > >