emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Bug: Column mode breaks beamer export [6.33trans]
@ 2009-12-15  8:07 Robin Green
  2009-12-16 10:12 ` Carsten Dominik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robin Green @ 2009-12-15  8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-orgmode

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3197 bytes --]


After I enable "column view of properties" in the attached file, export
to PDF via LaTeX fails with the following error in the minibuffer:

org-export-as-latex: Text is read-only: "Type `e' to edit property"

Emacs  : GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.18.0)
 of 2009-09-27 on palmer, modified by Debian
Package: Org-mode version 6.33trans

current state:
==============
(setq
 org-export-latex-after-initial-vars-hook '(org-beamer-after-initial-vars)
 org-agenda-files '("/src/greenrd/org")
 org-blocker-hook '(org-block-todo-from-checkboxes org-block-todo-from-children-or-siblings-or-parent)
 org-checklist-export-function 'org-export-as-ascii
 org-after-todo-state-change-hook '(org-clock-out-if-current org-checklist)
 org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled t
 org-startup-folded nil
 org-agenda-sorting-strategy '((agenda time-up priority-down effort-up category-keep)
			       (todo priority-down effort-up category-keep)
			       (tags priority-down effort-up category-keep) (search category-keep))
 org-agenda-prefix-format '((agenda . "  %-12:c%-12:T%?-12t% s") (timeline . "  % s") (todo . "  %-12:c")
			    (tags . "  %-12:c") (search . "  %-12:c"))
 org-deadline-warning-days 900
 org-export-latex-format-toc-function 'org-export-latex-format-toc-default
 org-agenda-skip-scheduled-if-done t
 org-export-preprocess-hook '(org-export-blocks-preprocess)
 org-tab-first-hook '(org-hide-block-toggle-maybe)
 org-src-mode-hook '(org-src-mode-configure-edit-buffer)
 org-confirm-shell-link-function 'yes-or-no-p
 org-export-first-hook '(org-beamer-initialize-open-trackers)
 org-todo-keywords '((sequence "TODO(t)" "QUESTION(q)" "PLANNING(p)" "PENDING(e)" "STARTED(s)" "FINISHING(f)" "|"
		      "DONE(d)" "OBSOLETE(o)")
		     )
 org-agenda-before-write-hook '(org-agenda-add-entry-text)
 org-default-notes-file "/src/greenrd/org/remember.org"
 org-cycle-hook '(org-cycle-hide-archived-subtrees org-cycle-hide-drawers org-cycle-show-empty-lines
		  org-optimize-window-after-visibility-change)
 org-mode-hook '(#[nil "\300\301\302\303\304$\207"
		   [org-add-hook change-major-mode-hook org-show-block-all append local] 5]
		 )
 org-global-properties '(("Effort_ALL" . "0 0:10 0:30 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00"))
 org-return-follows-link t
 org-confirm-elisp-link-function 'yes-or-no-p
 org-beamer-environments-extra '(("figure" "F" "\\begin{figure}" "\\end{figure}"))
 org-agenda-todo-ignore-with-date t
 org-enforce-todo-dependencies t
 org-occur-hook '(org-first-headline-recenter)
 org-priority-start-cycle-with-default nil
 org-export-preprocess-before-selecting-backend-code-hook '(org-beamer-select-beamer-code)
 org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines t
 org-modules '(org-bbdb org-bibtex org-gnus org-info org-jsinfo org-irc org-mew org-mhe org-rmail org-vm org-wl
	       org-w3m org-checklist org-interactive-query org-man org-registry)
 org-remember-templates '(("Web link" 119 "* %u %c \n\n%:region\n" nil "Web links" nil))
 org-export-latex-final-hook '(org-beamer-amend-header org-beamer-fix-toc org-beamer-auto-fragile-frames
			       org-beamer-place-default-actions-for-lists)
 org-enforce-todo-checkbox-dependencies t
 org-lowest-priority 70
 )


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 4429 bytes --]

#+STARTUP: beamer
#+TITLE: Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation
#+AUTHOR: Simon Buckingham Shum
#+LaTeX_CLASS: beamer
#+LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [presentation]
#+BEAMER_FRAME_LEVEL: 2

#+BEAMER_HEADER_EXTRA: \usetheme{Szeged}\usecolortheme{wolverine}\institute{Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, UK}
#+COLUMNS: %45ITEM %10BEAMER_env(Env) %10BEAMER_envargs(Env Args) %4BEAMER_col(Col) %8BEAMER_extra(Extra)
#+PROPERTY: BEAMER_col_ALL 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 :ETC

* Context

** What is argumentation software? 

*** *mapping* an argument					      :BMCOL:
:PROPERTIES:
:BEAMER_col: 0.5
:BEAMER_envargs: C[T]
:END:

**** exposing its structure

***** typically in graph form

*** for the purposes of this talk
# I was going to say "typically" here, but I've only read 4-5 papers
# in this area, so I can't be sure that it's typical. But that's how
# it seems to me.

**** *manual* data entry

***** not extraction

**** can relate back to sources

***** links

***** video timestamps

*** 							     :B_figure:BMCOL: :BMCOL:B_figure:
    :PROPERTIES:
    :BEAMER_col: 0.5
    :BEAMER_env: figure
    :END:
\includegraphics[width=.7\columnwidth]{What_the_Bible_says.jpg}

*** optionally

**** *queries* for sub-arguments

**** *multiple* I/O styles

***** directed graph

***** textual outline

**** *collaborative editing*

** Why use argumentation software?

*** example: climate change debates

*** large and complex

*** interdisciplinary

**** science

**** politics

**** economics

**** ethics

*** timely

**** Copenhagen conference

***** G77 delegates walk out

*** relevant to Cohere

**** ESSENCE project

** How might argumentation software help?

*** could make large, complex arguments

**** easier to navigate?

**** easier to search?

**** quicker to grasp?

***** or maybe /think/ you've grasped!

**** less repetitive

***** but Flat Earthers still exist

*** propagate updates in knowledge faster?

**** propagate lies and stupid ideas faster?

*** make debate more meritocratic?

**** "blogging will level the playing field" all over again?

** What does this sound like?

*** Wikipedia

**** similar advantages have been attributed to it

*** Is argumentation software reinventing the wheel?

**** inaccessibility of WP technical & scientific articles

**** different goals and value systems

***** WP: "Neutral Point of View" allows "he said / she said"

***** WP: Reliable Sources and Notability

***** WP: info not systematically structured along debate lines

* The paper

** Introduction

*** Motivation

**** 								:B_quotation:
     :PROPERTIES:
     :BEAMER_env: quotation
     :END:
The context in which we find ourselves presents problems on a global scale which will
require negotiation and collaboration across national, cultural and intellectual
boundaries.

*** Differences from related work

**** distributed vs team-based

**** asynchronous vs real-time

**** introducing Web 2.0 principles

** Web 2.0 according to Buckingham Shum

*** Some have dismissed as marketing term

*** Four relevant elements

**** Simple but engaging multimedia UIs

***** Web UIs should stand on a par with desktop UIs

**** Emergent, not predefined, structure and semantics

***** let users define their own classification schemes

***** lightweight approaches (tags for blogs, social tagging) have good uptake

**** Social networks

***** status updates, friend recommendations, "reputation" indices

**** Data interop, mashups and embedding

** Cohere data model

*** 								   :B_figure:
    :PROPERTIES:
    :BEAMER_env: figure
    :END:
\includegraphics[width=.7\textwidth]{Cohere-data-model.png}

** Web 2.0-ish features

*** Emergent structure

**** Users can add own relation types

***** but seed data & autocompletion used to "nudge" users

*** Social

**** each idea links back to creating user

**** Future / in development

***** sitewide feeds (like Twitter's "everyone")

***** active user stats

***** notification when your idea is connected to someone else's

***** notification when your idea is embedded in another website

***** different views for when multiple people work on one idea (vague)

** Interop

*** XML-based feeds (RSS/Atom)

*** high level of addressability

**** almost everything has a unique URL

***** allows embedding using HTML iframes

*** import from Compendium offline argumentation tool

*** Future

**** export in a "variety of formats"

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 201 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Bug: Column mode breaks beamer export [6.33trans]
  2009-12-15  8:07 Bug: Column mode breaks beamer export [6.33trans] Robin Green
@ 2009-12-16 10:12 ` Carsten Dominik
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2009-12-16 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robin Green; +Cc: emacs-orgmode

Fixed, thank you for the report.

- Carsten

On Dec 15, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Robin Green wrote:

>
> After I enable "column view of properties" in the attached file,  
> export
> to PDF via LaTeX fails with the following error in the minibuffer:
>
> org-export-as-latex: Text is read-only: "Type `e' to edit property"
>
> Emacs  : GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.18.0)
> of 2009-09-27 on palmer, modified by Debian
> Package: Org-mode version 6.33trans
>
> current state:
> ==============
> (setq
> org-export-latex-after-initial-vars-hook '(org-beamer-after-initial- 
> vars)
> org-agenda-files '("/src/greenrd/org")
> org-blocker-hook '(org-block-todo-from-checkboxes org-block-todo- 
> from-children-or-siblings-or-parent)
> org-checklist-export-function 'org-export-as-ascii
> org-after-todo-state-change-hook '(org-clock-out-if-current org- 
> checklist)
> org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled t
> org-startup-folded nil
> org-agenda-sorting-strategy '((agenda time-up priority-down effort- 
> up category-keep)
> 			       (todo priority-down effort-up category-keep)
> 			       (tags priority-down effort-up category-keep) (search  
> category-keep))
> org-agenda-prefix-format '((agenda . "  %-12:c%-12:T%?-12t% s")  
> (timeline . "  % s") (todo . "  %-12:c")
> 			    (tags . "  %-12:c") (search . "  %-12:c"))
> org-deadline-warning-days 900
> org-export-latex-format-toc-function 'org-export-latex-format-toc- 
> default
> org-agenda-skip-scheduled-if-done t
> org-export-preprocess-hook '(org-export-blocks-preprocess)
> org-tab-first-hook '(org-hide-block-toggle-maybe)
> org-src-mode-hook '(org-src-mode-configure-edit-buffer)
> org-confirm-shell-link-function 'yes-or-no-p
> org-export-first-hook '(org-beamer-initialize-open-trackers)
> org-todo-keywords '((sequence "TODO(t)" "QUESTION(q)" "PLANNING(p)"  
> "PENDING(e)" "STARTED(s)" "FINISHING(f)" "|"
> 		      "DONE(d)" "OBSOLETE(o)")
> 		     )
> org-agenda-before-write-hook '(org-agenda-add-entry-text)
> org-default-notes-file "/src/greenrd/org/remember.org"
> org-cycle-hook '(org-cycle-hide-archived-subtrees org-cycle-hide- 
> drawers org-cycle-show-empty-lines
> 		  org-optimize-window-after-visibility-change)
> org-mode-hook '(#[nil "\300\301\302\303\304$\207"
> 		   [org-add-hook change-major-mode-hook org-show-block-all append  
> local] 5]
> 		 )
> org-global-properties '(("Effort_ALL" . "0 0:10 0:30 1:00 2:00 3:00  
> 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00"))
> org-return-follows-link t
> org-confirm-elisp-link-function 'yes-or-no-p
> org-beamer-environments-extra '(("figure" "F" "\\begin{figure}" "\ 
> \end{figure}"))
> org-agenda-todo-ignore-with-date t
> org-enforce-todo-dependencies t
> org-occur-hook '(org-first-headline-recenter)
> org-priority-start-cycle-with-default nil
> org-export-preprocess-before-selecting-backend-code-hook '(org- 
> beamer-select-beamer-code)
> org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines t
> org-modules '(org-bbdb org-bibtex org-gnus org-info org-jsinfo org- 
> irc org-mew org-mhe org-rmail org-vm org-wl
> 	       org-w3m org-checklist org-interactive-query org-man org- 
> registry)
> org-remember-templates '(("Web link" 119 "* %u %c \n\n%:region\n"  
> nil "Web links" nil))
> org-export-latex-final-hook '(org-beamer-amend-header org-beamer-fix- 
> toc org-beamer-auto-fragile-frames
> 			       org-beamer-place-default-actions-for-lists)
> org-enforce-todo-checkbox-dependencies t
> org-lowest-priority 70
> )
>
> #+STARTUP: beamer
> #+TITLE: Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation
> #+AUTHOR: Simon Buckingham Shum
> #+LaTeX_CLASS: beamer
> #+LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [presentation]
> #+BEAMER_FRAME_LEVEL: 2
>
> #+BEAMER_HEADER_EXTRA: \usetheme{Szeged}\usecolortheme{wolverine} 
> \institute{Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, UK}
> #+COLUMNS: %45ITEM %10BEAMER_env(Env) %10BEAMER_envargs(Env Args)  
> %4BEAMER_col(Col) %8BEAMER_extra(Extra)
> #+PROPERTY: BEAMER_col_ALL 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9  
> 1.0 :ETC
>
> * Context
>
> ** What is argumentation software?
>
> *** *mapping* an argument					      :BMCOL:
> :PROPERTIES:
> :BEAMER_col: 0.5
> :BEAMER_envargs: C[T]
> :END:
>
> **** exposing its structure
>
> ***** typically in graph form
>
> *** for the purposes of this talk
> # I was going to say "typically" here, but I've only read 4-5 papers
> # in this area, so I can't be sure that it's typical. But that's how
> # it seems to me.
>
> **** *manual* data entry
>
> ***** not extraction
>
> **** can relate back to sources
>
> ***** links
>
> ***** video timestamps
>
> *** 							     :B_figure:BMCOL: :BMCOL:B_figure:
>    :PROPERTIES:
>    :BEAMER_col: 0.5
>    :BEAMER_env: figure
>    :END:
> \includegraphics[width=.7\columnwidth]{What_the_Bible_says.jpg}
>
> *** optionally
>
> **** *queries* for sub-arguments
>
> **** *multiple* I/O styles
>
> ***** directed graph
>
> ***** textual outline
>
> **** *collaborative editing*
>
> ** Why use argumentation software?
>
> *** example: climate change debates
>
> *** large and complex
>
> *** interdisciplinary
>
> **** science
>
> **** politics
>
> **** economics
>
> **** ethics
>
> *** timely
>
> **** Copenhagen conference
>
> ***** G77 delegates walk out
>
> *** relevant to Cohere
>
> **** ESSENCE project
>
> ** How might argumentation software help?
>
> *** could make large, complex arguments
>
> **** easier to navigate?
>
> **** easier to search?
>
> **** quicker to grasp?
>
> ***** or maybe /think/ you've grasped!
>
> **** less repetitive
>
> ***** but Flat Earthers still exist
>
> *** propagate updates in knowledge faster?
>
> **** propagate lies and stupid ideas faster?
>
> *** make debate more meritocratic?
>
> **** "blogging will level the playing field" all over again?
>
> ** What does this sound like?
>
> *** Wikipedia
>
> **** similar advantages have been attributed to it
>
> *** Is argumentation software reinventing the wheel?
>
> **** inaccessibility of WP technical & scientific articles
>
> **** different goals and value systems
>
> ***** WP: "Neutral Point of View" allows "he said / she said"
>
> ***** WP: Reliable Sources and Notability
>
> ***** WP: info not systematically structured along debate lines
>
> * The paper
>
> ** Introduction
>
> *** Motivation
>
> **** 								:B_quotation:
>     :PROPERTIES:
>     :BEAMER_env: quotation
>     :END:
> The context in which we find ourselves presents problems on a global  
> scale which will
> require negotiation and collaboration across national, cultural and  
> intellectual
> boundaries.
>
> *** Differences from related work
>
> **** distributed vs team-based
>
> **** asynchronous vs real-time
>
> **** introducing Web 2.0 principles
>
> ** Web 2.0 according to Buckingham Shum
>
> *** Some have dismissed as marketing term
>
> *** Four relevant elements
>
> **** Simple but engaging multimedia UIs
>
> ***** Web UIs should stand on a par with desktop UIs
>
> **** Emergent, not predefined, structure and semantics
>
> ***** let users define their own classification schemes
>
> ***** lightweight approaches (tags for blogs, social tagging) have  
> good uptake
>
> **** Social networks
>
> ***** status updates, friend recommendations, "reputation" indices
>
> **** Data interop, mashups and embedding
>
> ** Cohere data model
>
> *** 								   :B_figure:
>    :PROPERTIES:
>    :BEAMER_env: figure
>    :END:
> \includegraphics[width=.7\textwidth]{Cohere-data-model.png}
>
> ** Web 2.0-ish features
>
> *** Emergent structure
>
> **** Users can add own relation types
>
> ***** but seed data & autocompletion used to "nudge" users
>
> *** Social
>
> **** each idea links back to creating user
>
> **** Future / in development
>
> ***** sitewide feeds (like Twitter's "everyone")
>
> ***** active user stats
>
> ***** notification when your idea is connected to someone else's
>
> ***** notification when your idea is embedded in another website
>
> ***** different views for when multiple people work on one idea  
> (vague)
>
> ** Interop
>
> *** XML-based feeds (RSS/Atom)
>
> *** high level of addressability
>
> **** almost everything has a unique URL
>
> ***** allows embedding using HTML iframes
>
> *** import from Compendium offline argumentation tool
>
> *** Future
>
> **** export in a "variety of formats"
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

- Carsten

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-16 10:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-15  8:07 Bug: Column mode breaks beamer export [6.33trans] Robin Green
2009-12-16 10:12 ` Carsten Dominik

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).