From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joakim@verona.se Subject: Re: ox-odt roundtrip editing? Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:34:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z8qG3-0001K4-Mh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:35:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z8qFz-00063g-MX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:34:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.bahnhof.se ([213.80.101.11]:56163) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z8qFz-00062X-G9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:34:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Ken Mankoff's message of "Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:08:45 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ken Mankoff Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Ken Mankoff writes: > Hi Joakim, > > On 2015-06-26 at 07:45, joakim@verona.se wrote: >> I'm writing a manuscript for a publisher. The process looks like: >> >> - I write a chapter in org mode, export it to odt >> >> - I apply the styles the publisher wants to use with a libreoffice >> macro. This isn't particularily efficient, but I failed at modifying >> ox-odt to use custom templates. >> >> - I get back comments on the chapter from the publisher, that use the >> libreoffice annotation feature. Here I basically can't use org-mode >> anymore. >> >> Has someone attempted doing roundtrip editing ith libreoffice and org? >> That is, convert the odt file back to org, including the annotations, >> and edit fro there? > > Does this workflow describe what you want to do (but change DOCX to ODT)? > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2015-06/msg00246.html It seems so. I'm not quite sure, I will have a close look. Thanks! > > > -k. -- Joakim Verona