From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd) Subject: Re: Timestamps Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:46:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GmvH6-00051t-2I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:48:40 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GmvH3-0004yA-So for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:48:38 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmvH3-0004xc-Ko for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:48:37 -0500 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GmvH3-0002tX-4o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:48:37 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GmvGH-00031l-FD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:47:51 +0100 Received: from 10-169.35-65.tampabay.res.rr.com ([65.35.169.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:47:49 +0100 Received: from david by 10-169.35-65.tampabay.res.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:47:49 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org david@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd) writes: > "Eddward DeVilla" writes: > >> I had to look that up myself. It's 'C-u C-c .'. You may want to look >> up the option org-time-stamp-rounding-minutes also. >> >> Edd >> >> On 11/22/06, J. David Boyd wrote: >>> >>> Sorry everyone, I thought I saw this in the docs, but I can't find it now. >>> >>> Is there someway to insert a timestamp, rather than a 'date' stamp? >>> >>> Dave >>> > > Thanks guys. This is what I was looking for, and lead me to the corollary, > C-u C-c ! for making non-active timestamps with the time in them. s/lead me/led me/