From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joakim@verona.se Subject: Re: Xiki framework (wiki and tree emacs features) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:55:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <878wb7r196.fsf@everybody.org> <87ljf7p31h.fsf@everybody.org> <86d40hz3f4.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <86d40hz3f4.fsf@gmail.com> (Glauber Alex Dias Prado's message of "Sun, 07 Feb 2010 09:33:03 -0200") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Glauber Alex Dias Prado Cc: mah@everybody.org, Craig Muth , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org List-Id: emacs-orgmode.gnu.org Glauber Alex Dias Prado writes: > Richard Stallman writes: > >> Please point me to the part of OrgMode with features for >> navigating and searching the filesystem in a tree structure. I'm >> interested in checking i= t out and comparing it to xiki. >> >> The question that suggests itself to me >> is whether there is a way to separate out the various ideas, >> implemented by xiki and by Org mode, into modular features. > > Just to tell my grandchildren that once i was in the same thread as rms > :), these two tools are awesome and i am using both, and would take > advantage of a more modular design for easy integration instead of each > one working in its own pet. Just a data-point, but I've been using planner-mode for years, which resembles Org-mode, and also seemingly Xiki, which I havent tried yet. Planner uses Muse as its underlying wiki mode, and Muse is included in Emacs. As a user, I would also favor modularisation and re-use between these modes. > > cheers, > glauber. > -- Joakim Verona